Bonne
Banaanisose
Purees. Ingredients: Banaani (Ei-EU) 100 %.. Evidence quality: high
Nutri-ScoreANOVA1Lower processing burden
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Bonne
Purees. Ingredients: Banaani (Ei-EU) 100 %.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Pirkka
Purees. Ingredients: luomupäärynä (ei-EU). Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Coop
Purees. Ingredients: Banaanisose (70 %), mangosus (20%), passiohedelmäsose (10 %).. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
rainbow
Purees. Ingredients: Luomumangosose (muu kuin EU (Peru ja/tai Brasilia)). Ei sisällä gluteenia.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
19 kcal
Protein / 100g
0.5 g
Sugar / 100g
2.6 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Pumpkin* 85%, water. *organic ingredients.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Processing
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
73/100
Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.
Processing
Minimally processed
Minimally processed
Minimally processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
76/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
No significant negative factors emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 67%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
Madal kiudainesisaldus ja rafineeritud süsivesikud viitavad toidule, mis toetab nõrgemalt täiskõhutunnet.
Kohe
Võib põhjustada kiiremat glükoosikõikumist ja varasemat näljatunnet.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine võib halvendada üldist toidukvaliteeti ja seostub ebasoodsama ainevahetusprofiiliga.
Loogika: fiber100g < 1.5 g/100 g või fiber100g < 3 g/100 g koos rafineeritud süsivesikute markeritega.
Signaalid: Kiudained 0.9 g/100 g jäävad alla üldlävendi 3 g/100 g. · Kiudainesisaldus jääb alla tugeva riskisignaali lävendi 1.5 g/100 g.
Riskisignaal sõltub kogu menüü kiudainete tasemest, mitte ainult ühest tootest.
Madal kiudainesisaldus on lapse vaates oluline, sest see mõjutab nii täiskõhutunnet kui ka seedimise mugavust.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle, et aidata vanemal hoida lapse menüüs rohkem täistera, kaunvilju, puu- ja köögivilju.
Kohe
Võimalik on kiirem näljatunde taastumine või raskem seedimine.
Pikemas vaates
Võib vähendada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti ja hoida kiudainete tarbimise püsivalt liiga madalal.
Põhineb tugeval rahvusvahelisel juhisel: WHO süsivesikute kvaliteedi ja kiudainete soovitused.
Signaalid: Kiudained 0.9 g/100 g jäävad alla üldlävendi 3 g/100 g. · Kiudainesisaldus jääb alla tugevama alamsignaali lävendi 1.5 g/100 g.