Pirkka
Päärynä luomu
Purees. Ingredients: luomupäärynä (ei-EU). Evidence quality: medium
Nutri-ScoreBNOVA1Lower processing burden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Pirkka
Purees. Ingredients: luomupäärynä (ei-EU). Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Coop
Purees. Ingredients: Banaanisose (70 %), mangosus (20%), passiohedelmäsose (10 %).. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
rainbow
Purees. Ingredients: Luomumangosose (muu kuin EU (Peru ja/tai Brasilia)). Ei sisällä gluteenia.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Saarioinen
Purees. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Banaani (Ei-EU) 100 %.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Processing
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
73/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Minimally processed
Minimally processed
Minimally processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
86/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
No significant negative factors emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.