Mix Buffet Verrines Duo de saumons et Citron, Pâtes perles et aneth · Nutrisiq

Mix Buffet Verrines Duo de saumons et Citron, Pâtes perles et aneth packshot

Nutrition snapshot

Mix Buffet Verrines Duo de saumons et Citron, Pâtes perles et aneth

Name: Mix Buffet Verrines Duo de saumons et Citron, Pâtes perles et aneth
Brand: Mix Buffet
SKU: 3700009260289

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Moderate signal

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from Mix Buffet Suggest correction

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (48 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryVerrines

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity6 x 45g

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score65/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Pâtes alimentaires perles aux OEUFS cuites 26,8% (eau, semoule de BLÉ dur, OEUFS), SAUMON cuit 20,5% (SAUMON Atlantique Salmo salar, sel), huile de colza, eau, FROMAGE blanc 0% de matières grasses, concombres, SAUMON fumé 6,6% (SAUMON Atlantique Salmo salar, sel), vinaigre d’alcool, MOUTARDE de Dijon (eau, graines de MOUTARDE, vinaigre d’alcool, sel), jaune d’OEUF, jus de citron concentré 0,5%, sel, aneth 0,3%, citron confit 0,1%, ciboulette, épices, épaississant : gomme xanthane, huile de tournesol.

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 65/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 85/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (48 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts Verrines Tomates marinées & Noix de St Jaques

Verrines. Ingredients: Huile de colza, tomates mi-séchées 17,8%, tomates 16,3%, FROMAGE blanc 0% de matières grasses 9,2%, eau, extrait d’algues 4,5% (Laminaria saccharina, Laminaria digitata, Ascopyllum nodosum),NOIX DE SAINT-JACQUES* cuites 3,7%, huile de tournesol, jaune d'OEUF, MOUTARDE de Dijon (eau, graines de MOUTARDE, vinaigre d’alcool, sel), sucre, whisky, vinaigre d’alcool, sel, échalotes, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, herbes de Provence 0,2%, colorants : E160c - E160e, épaississant : gomme xanthane, ciboulette, épices, jus de citron concentré, acidifiant : acide citrique, conservateur : sorbate de potassium, arôme naturel de poivre.. Evidence quality: high

56/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

87/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

56/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts 6 Verrines Pesto vert et Tomates, Parmesan

Verrines. Ingredients: Huile de colza, tomates 29,9%, FROMAGE 25,5%, YAOURT à la grecque 9,1%, basilic 7,9%, eau, purée de tomates 2,5%, huile d’olive vierge extra, tomates mi-séchées 1,8%, sel, ail, PARMIGIANO REGGIANO 1,1%, vinaigre d’alcool, NOIX DE CAJOU, oignons, MOUTARDE de Dijon (eau, graines de MOUTARDE, vinaigre d’alcool, sel), poivre blanc, épaississant : gomme xanthane, jus concentré de tomates, huile de tournesol, jus concentré de citron.. Evidence quality: high

53/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

85/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

53/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Mix Buffet Verrines Chèvre et Tartare Tomates 6 x 35 g

Verrines. Evidence quality: high

47/100

nutrition score

Strong evidence coverageVerrines

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Nutrition profile

Data confidence

77/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

47/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

—

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (48 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryVerrines

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity6 x 45g

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score65/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 65/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 85/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (48 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts Verrines Tomates marinées & Noix de St Jaques

56/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

87/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

56/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts 6 Verrines Pesto vert et Tomates, Parmesan

53/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

85/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

53/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Mix Buffet Verrines Chèvre et Tartare Tomates 6 x 35 g

Verrines. Evidence quality: high

47/100

nutrition score

Strong evidence coverageVerrines

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Nutrition profile

Data confidence

77/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

47/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

—

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Mix Buffet Verrines Duo de saumons et Citron, Pâtes perles et aneth

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 65/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts Verrines Tomates marinées & Noix de St Jaques

Open Food Facts 6 Verrines Pesto vert et Tomates, Parmesan

Mix Buffet Verrines Chèvre et Tartare Tomates 6 x 35 g

Mix Buffet Verrines Duo de saumons et Citron, Pâtes perles et aneth

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 65/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts Verrines Tomates marinées & Noix de St Jaques

Open Food Facts 6 Verrines Pesto vert et Tomates, Parmesan

Mix Buffet Verrines Chèvre et Tartare Tomates 6 x 35 g

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs