Aptonia Energy gel · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Aptonia Energy gel

Name: Aptonia Energy gel
Brand: Aptonia
SKU: 3583788207276

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Moderate signal

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from Aptonia Suggest correction

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (26 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryGel Energetique

Label information quality84/100

Data confidence

Quantity32 g

PackagingGourde

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score44/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

Sirop de glucose, eau, fructose, maltodextrine, acide citrique, citrate de sodium, sorbate de potassium, arôme, citrate de zinc, vitamines B1, B6, B12, E, concentré de spiruline, carthame

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 44/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 85/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

44/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

84/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (26 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Overstims Coup de fouet bio citron

Gel Energetique. Ingredients: sirop de glucose*, eau, poudre de jus d’acérola* (jus concentré d’acérola* (extrait sec 50%), maltodextrine*), arômes naturels citron (0,45%) et menthe, gelée royale* décongelée, sel, vitamine B1 (Thiamine). Evidence quality: high

38/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

83/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Weak

38/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

51/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

83/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Isostar Isostar Energy Actifood Exotic

Gel Energetique. Ingredients: Riche en vitamines rée et d'un mode d'une alimentation ce de vitamine B1. Ce came m conditum d'environnement spéciale et consommes directement: rectué nocamment exotique/ 13%, jus gomme formations concentré de fruit de la passion geliant pectines, amidon modif Sirop de glucose, eau, pure de banane 13%, purene boisson allergenes: www.isostar.com ES>Gel rico en hidratos de carbono. Rico en vit Ey fuente xanthane, aromes, vitamines C, E et thiamine, antioxydant: acide ascorbic un estilo de vida saludable a cubrir las necesidades musculares mientras se realiza un eshy zo de vitamina B1. Este producto responde, en el marco de una alimentación va da y equilibrada, envase. Combinar con una bebida Isostar, INGREDIENTES: Jarabe de glucosa, aqua, puré de atano fisico/Sabor frutas exóticas/CONSEJOS DE UTILIZACION: abrir y consumir directamedel 13%, puré de mango 13%, zumo concentrado de fruta de la pasión 4%, gelificante: pectinas almidón modificado, espesante: goma xantana, aromas, vitaminas C, Ey tiamina, Antioxidante: acido ascórbico. Información alergenos: www.isostar.com DE-AT-CH>Kohlenhydrathaltiges Gel. CH: Ergänzungsnahrung. Reich an Vitamin C und mit Vitamin B1. Ellen werden ne abwechslungsreiche und ausgewogene Emährung sowie eine gesunde Lebensweise. Gee et für Sport und Wettkamper Fruchtgeschmack/ANWENDUNG: Verschluss öffnen und direkt aus dem Beutel konsumeren. Dazu genügend Isostar & Perform trinken. ZUTATEN: Glukosesirup, Wasser, Bananenpüree 13%, Mangopüree 13%, konzentrierter Passionsfru Gelermittel: Pektin, modifizierte Stärke, Verdickungsmittel: Xanthan, Aromen, Vitamin C, E und Thiamin, Anton korbinsäure. Produktinformationen und Allergene: www.isostar.com NFORMATION NUTRITIONNELLE/INFORMACIÓN NUTRICIONAL/NÄHRWERTANGABEN energétique/Valor energético/Brennwert es grasses/Grasas/Fett as gras saturés/de las cuales saturadas/davon gesättigte Fettsäuren desidratos de carbono/Kohlenhydrate 100 g 2 90g 867/204 782/18 0 0. Evidence quality: high

64/100

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (26 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryGel Energetique

Label information quality84/100

Data confidence

Quantity32 g

PackagingGourde

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score44/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

Sirop de glucose, eau, fructose, maltodextrine, acide citrique, citrate de sodium, sorbate de potassium, arôme, citrate de zinc, vitamines B1, B6, B12, E, concentré de spiruline, carthame

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 44/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 85/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

44/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

84/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (26 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Similar options worth comparing

Overstims Coup de fouet bio citron

38/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

83/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Weak

38/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

51/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

83/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Isostar Isostar Energy Actifood Exotic

64/100

Aptonia Energy gel

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 44/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Overstims Coup de fouet bio citron

Isostar Isostar Energy Actifood Exotic

Aptonia Energy gel

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 44/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Overstims Coup de fouet bio citron

Isostar Isostar Energy Actifood Exotic

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs