Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.



Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
13
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Sucre, amidon modifié, LAIT écrémé en poudre, LACTOSÉRUM, huile de noix de coco, sirop de glucose, émulsifiants (E472b, E339ii, E450iii), protéines de LAIT, arômes (contient LAIT), gélifiant (E 407), colorant (E160aii).
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
13
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 87/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result points to clear risk and low quality.
Nutrition profile
Very weak
13/100
13
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
12
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
51/100
51
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
89/100
89
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (31 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products

Preparations Pour Patisseries. Ingredients: Sucre, noix de coco (40,49 %) blanc d'_œuf_, lait de noix de coco, farine de _blé_ (présence de _gluten_), arôme, sel.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
4
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
83/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Preparations Pour Patisseries. Ingredients: sucre, sirop de glucose, huiles et graisses végétales non hydrogénées (huile de palme, coton, carthame et tournesol, beurre de karité et d'illipé), eau, amidon de maïs, épaississant : E466, E407, E412. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
31
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
90/100
high reliability

Preparations Pour Patisseries. Ingredients: Amidon de maïs, farine de riz, sucre, épaississant : gomme guar - hydroxypropyl-methylcellulose - gomme de cellulose, poudres à lever : pyrophosphate de soude et bicarbonate de soude.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
58
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
88/100
high reliability

Preparations Pour Patisseries. Ingredients: Sucre - huile de colza - eau - farine de blé - amidon de pomme de terre - œuf en poudre - stabilisants : glycérol, gomme xanthane - arôme naturel de citron 1,5% - poudres à lever : phosphates de sodium, carbonates de sodium (contient blé) - émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras - conservateur : sorbate de potassium - sel. Traces de soja.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
42
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
85/100
high reliability
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage