The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Ocean Fish
Fish And Meat And Eggs. Ingredients: Lcre de somon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) 97%, sare, conservanti (benzoat de sodiu, acid sorbic). Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Bonito
Fish And Meat And Eggs. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Alaska Seafood
Fish And Meat And Eggs. Ingredients: Oncorhynchus nerka ikrai 97%, valgomoji druska, E200, E211. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Open Food Facts
Fish And Meat And Eggs. Ingredients: water, gelatin pig skin, iodized salt, fish bullion (salt, sugar, flavorings, zuvis, yeast extracts, black pepper paired vegetables garlic, onion flavor enhancers: e621, e635 rosehinguna regulator, e330), rapeseed alliler, dye (papriku extract, oltrnos nigtis, antioxloant (2300), konservankai (e202, (211). Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Pi cduit a ccrtsommer cuit a coear : PANSE UE BOEUF, UE GELEE CERIJ, UERTHOSE, HCIOIFIRNTS S'E330, BROMES NRTURELS), VIN BI.HNC (TRACE OE COUENNE OE PORC CUITE, CAROTTE, SEL, CI)NSEHVBTEIJB E220, SEL, HIL EN PULPE (BIL FRRIS BROYE), POIVRE, BROÈIES NIITURELS Pi cduit fabrique dans un atnLier utiLizant du LRIT, CERERLES SOJR, CELERI, PISTHCHE, HOUTRROE. ORIGINE VlflNOES : V \LEUR NIJTiilTlONNELLE : VHLEUH ÉNERGÉTIQUE kJ), GRHSSES (DONT ac10E 126), GLUCIOES (DONT SUCRES 1.7G), PROTEIFES 106, SEL 1.506 R conserver antre 1 et AJC
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
67/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
Moderately processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
47/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
81/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
A long ingredient list (34 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
