Name: Le Grand Lejon Parmentier de saumon et épinards
Brand: Le Grand Lejon
SKU: 3394610004662

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryParmentiers

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity300 g

Ownership

Processing

Highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 3

Performance

Nutrition score67/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

_Saumon_ 16%, épinards de Bretagne 15%, _cabillaud_ 14%, eau, _lait_ , _crème fraîche_ 10%, pommes de terre origine France 9% (contient conservateur : _disulfite_ de sodium), flocons de pomme de terre (contient épice, conservateur : _disulfite_ de sodium, antioxydant : E320), oignons, huile de tournesol, huile d'olive, sel, ail, persil, ciboulette, poivre.

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 67/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 85/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

67/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (37 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Open Food Facts Parmentier de canard

Parmentiers. Ingredients: Eau, _LAIT_, viande de canard confite émincée 12% (Origine : UE), crème légère stérilisée (crème, stabilisant : E407), ( _LAIT_), flocon de pomme de terre (pommes de terre, émulsifiant : E471, stabilisant : E450i, épice, acidifiant : E330, conservateur : E223, antioxydant : E320), chapelure (farine de _BLÉ_, huile de colza, eau, sucre, levure et levain, sel, _GLUTEN DE BLÉ_, céréales moulues (_SEIGLE_, _AVOINE_, _BLÉ_, _EPEAUTRE_, _ORGE, riz, sarrasin), farine de fève, vinaigre d'alcool, dextrose, grains moulues (tournesol, lin,milletpavot, amarante, quinoa, _BEURRE_ (_LAIT_), oignons, beurre (_LAIT_), graisse de canard, marinade, base gersoise 0,6% (arômes, eau, maltodextrine, graisse de canard et extrait de volaille, poudre au beurre (_LAIT_), sel, extrait de vin rouge, épice et plantes aromatiques), base fond de canard (fond de canard (extrait de volaille, graisse et viande de canard (Origine : UE), eau), sel, huile de colza raffinée, purée d'ail, épaississants : E470a-E508-E410-E415, colorant : E150b, arôme naturel de poivre. Poucentages exprimés sur le produit fini.. Evidence quality: high

53/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

90/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

53/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

60/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts Parmentier de canard

53/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

90/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

53/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

60/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryParmentiers

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity300 g

Ownership

Processing

Highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 3

Performance

Nutrition score67/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 67/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 85/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

67/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (37 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Le Grand Lejon Parmentier de saumon et épinards

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 67/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts Parmentier de canard

Le Grand Lejon Parmentier de saumon et épinards

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts Parmentier de canard

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 67/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid