Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.
Need attention
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Formulation markers such as karamellvärv (E150), mono- ja diglütseriidid (E471), karageenaan (E407), ksantaankummi (E415) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (103 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Supporting factors
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Uncertain or missing data
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
What would improve the assessment
Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.
Structured source data
Facts used for scoring
Nutrition
Nutrition score53/100 · Grade D
Ingredient-level explanation
Eau, _LAIT_, viande de canard confite émincée 12% (Origine : UE), crème légère stérilisée (crème, stabilisant : E407), ( _LAIT_), flocon de pomme de terre (pommes de terre, émulsifiant : E471, stabilisant : E450i, épice, acidifiant : E330, conservateur : E223, antioxydant : E320), chapelure (farine de _BLÉ_, huile de colza, eau, sucre, levure et levain, sel, _GLUTEN DE BLÉ_, céréales moulues (_SEIGLE_, _AVOINE_, _BLÉ_, _EPEAUTRE_, _ORGE, riz, sarrasin), farine de fève, vinaigre d'alcool, dextrose, grains moulues (tournesol, lin,milletpavot, amarante, quinoa, _BEURRE_ (_LAIT_), oignons, beurre (_LAIT_), graisse de canard, marinade, base gersoise 0,6% (arômes, eau, maltodextrine, graisse de canard et extrait de volaille, poudre au beurre (_LAIT_), sel, extrait de vin rouge, épice et plantes aromatiques), base fond de canard (fond de canard (extrait de volaille, graisse et viande de canard (Origine : UE), eau), sel, huile de colza raffinée, purée d'ail, épaississants : E470a-E508-E410-E415, colorant : E150b, arôme naturel de poivre. Poucentages exprimés sur le produit fini.
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
high5/5 kontrollitud
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud
Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.
Category breakdown
How the separate signals line up
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
53/100
53/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
1
2
3
4
Very highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Quite good
60/100
60/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
81/100
81/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
What shaped the separate signals
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as karamellvärv (E150), mono- ja diglütseriidid (E471), karageenaan (E407), ksantaankummi (E415) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, quantity, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.
NOVA 4
Environmental Impact
Environmental signal
60
Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)
Ettevaatlikkus
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Ettevaatus: mõõdukasTõenduse tase: mõõdukasSihtrühm: lapsed ja täiskasvanudAllikas: töötlusklass
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
