Milical Milical Go - Barres Repas Chocolat saveur Abricot · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Milical Milical Go - Barres Repas Chocolat saveur Abricot

Name: Milical Milical Go - Barres Repas Chocolat saveur Abricot
Brand: Milical
SKU: 3175681195806

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Moderate signal

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from Milical Suggest correction

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (8.06 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (96 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategorySubtituts De Repas

Label information quality67/100

Data confidence

Quantity62 g (2 barres de 31 g)

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Energy / 100g

382 kcal

Protein / 100g

24.2 g

Sugar / 100g

19.4 g

Nutrition score62/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Protéines de soja, chocolat au lait de couverture 14% (sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait écrémé, lactosérum en poudre, pâte de cacao, matière grasse de lait, émulsifiant : lécithines de soja, arôme naturel de vanille), flocons de soja, cubes d'abricots secs 7,4% (conservateur : anhydride sulfureux), sirop de sucre inverti, stabilisant : maltitols, dextrine de blé liquide, flocons de blé complet 5,3%, protéines de blé, amandes torréfiées 4,5%, stabilisant : glycérol d'origine végétale, farine de riz, minéraux (potassium, calcium, magnésium, sodium, zinc, fer, manganèse, cuivre, iode, sélénium), sucre, amidon de tapioca, farine de blé, huile de tournesol, malt de blé, émulsifiant : lécithines de colza, arôme naturel d'abricot avec autres arômes naturels, sel, vitamines A, B1, B2, B5, B6, B9, B12, C, D, E (lactose, protéines de lait), K, H et PP, arôme naturel.

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 62/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 61/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

62/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

55/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Fiber (8.06 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (96 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: sodium per 100g or salt per 100g and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas chocolat

Subtituts De Repas. Ingredients: Lait écrémé, eau, sucre, protéines de lait , amidon modifié, chocolat en poudre 2% (sucre, pâte de cacao), cacao maigre en poudre, huile de soja, crème de lait, minéraux (sodium, calcium, potassium, magnésium, fer, zinc , sélénium, cuivre, manganèse, iode), épaississants : carraghénanes (extrait d'algues rouges) et gomme de guar, vitamines (A, C, D,E, K, B1, B2, B5, B6, PP, B9, B12, H), émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras.,. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

79/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas vanille caramel

Subtituts De Repas. Ingredients: Lait écrémé, eau, sucre, protéines de lait , amidon modifié, huile de colza, huile de soja, minéraux (sodium, calcium, potassium, magnésium, fer, zinc, sélénium, cuivre, manganèse, iode), arôme, épaississants : carraghénanes (extrait d'algues rouges) et gomme de guar, vitamines ( A, C, D,E, K, B1, B2, B5, B6, PP, B9, B12, H), colorant : caroténoïdes, émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras.. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

79/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Milical Milical Go - Repas à boire chocolat

Subtituts De Repas. Ingredients: Lait écrémé, sirop de fructose, eau, protéines de lait , huile de tournesol, cacao maigre en poudre 2%, minéraux (potassium, sodium, magnésium, fer, zinc, manganèse, cuivre, iode, sélénium), épaississants : cellulose, gomme cellulosique et carraghénanes (extrait d'algues rouges), arôme naturel, vitamines (A, C, D,E, K, B1, B2, B5, B6, PP, B9, B12, H).,. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

76/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

79/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Milical Milical Go Repas Minceur Vanille 236ML

Subtituts De Repas. Ingredients: Lait écrémé, eau, protéines de lait , sirop de glucose, sucre, huile de tournesol, épaississants : cellulose, gomme cellulosique et carraghénanes (extrait d'algues rouges), minéraux ( sodium, potassium, magnésium, fer, zinc, cuivre, manganèse, iode, sélénium), arômes, vitamines ( A, C, D,E, K, B1, B2, B5, B6, PP, B9, B12, H), colorant : caroténoïdes.,. Evidence quality: high

71/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

83/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

71/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (8.06 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (96 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategorySubtituts De Repas

Label information quality67/100

Data confidence

Quantity62 g (2 barres de 31 g)

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Energy / 100g

382 kcal

Protein / 100g

24.2 g

Sugar / 100g

19.4 g

Nutrition score62/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 62/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 61/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

62/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

55/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Fiber (8.06 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (96 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: sodium per 100g or salt per 100g and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas chocolat

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

79/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas vanille caramel

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

79/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Milical Milical Go - Repas à boire chocolat

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

76/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

79/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Milical Milical Go Repas Minceur Vanille 236ML

71/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

83/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

71/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Milical Milical Go - Barres Repas Chocolat saveur Abricot

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 62/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas chocolat

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas vanille caramel

Milical Milical Go - Repas à boire chocolat

Milical Milical Go Repas Minceur Vanille 236ML

Milical Milical Go - Barres Repas Chocolat saveur Abricot

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 62/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas chocolat

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas vanille caramel

Milical Milical Go - Repas à boire chocolat

Milical Milical Go Repas Minceur Vanille 236ML

What lowers the rating

Kõrge vabade suhkrute sisaldus

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Kõrge vabade suhkrute sisaldus lapse toidus

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs