Milical Milical Go - Repas à boire chocolat · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Milical Milical Go - Repas à boire chocolat packshot

Nutrition snapshot

Milical Milical Go - Repas à boire chocolat

Name: Milical Milical Go - Repas à boire chocolat
Brand: Milical
SKU: 3175681026636

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Signal unavailable

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from Milical Suggest correction

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (51 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategorySubtituts De Repas

Label information quality79/100

Data confidence

Quantity236 ml

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Lait écrémé, sirop de fructose, eau, protéines de lait , huile de tournesol, cacao maigre en poudre 2%, minéraux (potassium, sodium, magnésium, fer, zinc, manganèse, cuivre, iode, sélénium), épaississants : cellulose, gomme cellulosique et carraghénanes (extrait d'algues rouges), arôme naturel, vitamines (A, C, D,E, K, B1, B2, B5, B6, PP, B9, B12, H).,

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 76/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

79/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (51 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas chocolat

Subtituts De Repas. Ingredients: Lait écrémé, eau, sucre, protéines de lait , amidon modifié, chocolat en poudre 2% (sucre, pâte de cacao), cacao maigre en poudre, huile de soja, crème de lait, minéraux (sodium, calcium, potassium, magnésium, fer, zinc , sélénium, cuivre, manganèse, iode), épaississants : carraghénanes (extrait d'algues rouges) et gomme de guar, vitamines (A, C, D,E, K, B1, B2, B5, B6, PP, B9, B12, H), émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras.,. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

79/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas vanille caramel

Subtituts De Repas. Ingredients: Lait écrémé, eau, sucre, protéines de lait , amidon modifié, huile de colza, huile de soja, minéraux (sodium, calcium, potassium, magnésium, fer, zinc, sélénium, cuivre, manganèse, iode), arôme, épaississants : carraghénanes (extrait d'algues rouges) et gomme de guar, vitamines ( A, C, D,E, K, B1, B2, B5, B6, PP, B9, B12, H), colorant : caroténoïdes, émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras.. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

79/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Milical Milical Go - Barres Repas Chocolat saveur Abricot

Subtituts De Repas. Ingredients: Protéines de soja, chocolat au lait de couverture 14% (sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait écrémé, lactosérum en poudre, pâte de cacao, matière grasse de lait, émulsifiant : lécithines de soja, arôme naturel de vanille), flocons de soja, cubes d'abricots secs 7,4% (conservateur : anhydride sulfureux), sirop de sucre inverti, stabilisant : maltitols, dextrine de blé liquide, flocons de blé complet 5,3%, protéines de blé, amandes torréfiées 4,5%, stabilisant : glycérol d'origine végétale, farine de riz, minéraux (potassium, calcium, magnésium, sodium, zinc, fer, manganèse, cuivre, iode, sélénium), sucre, amidon de tapioca, farine de blé, huile de tournesol, malt de blé, émulsifiant : lécithines de colza, arôme naturel d'abricot avec autres arômes naturels, sel, vitamines A, B1, B2, B5, B6, B9, B12, C, D, E (lactose, protéines de lait), K, H et PP, arôme naturel.. Evidence quality: medium

62/100

nutrition score

Subtituts De Repas

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

61/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

62/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

55/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Milical Milical Go Repas Minceur Vanille 236ML

Subtituts De Repas. Ingredients: Lait écrémé, eau, protéines de lait , sirop de glucose, sucre, huile de tournesol, épaississants : cellulose, gomme cellulosique et carraghénanes (extrait d'algues rouges), minéraux ( sodium, potassium, magnésium, fer, zinc, cuivre, manganèse, iode, sélénium), arômes, vitamines ( A, C, D,E, K, B1, B2, B5, B6, PP, B9, B12, H), colorant : caroténoïdes.,. Evidence quality: high

71/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

83/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

71/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (51 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategorySubtituts De Repas

Label information quality79/100

Data confidence

Quantity236 ml

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 76/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

79/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (51 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Similar options worth comparing

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas chocolat

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

79/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas vanille caramel

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

79/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Milical Milical Go - Barres Repas Chocolat saveur Abricot

62/100

nutrition score

Subtituts De Repas

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

61/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

62/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

55/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Milical Milical Go Repas Minceur Vanille 236ML

71/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

83/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

71/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Milical Milical Go - Repas à boire chocolat

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas chocolat

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas vanille caramel

Milical Milical Go - Barres Repas Chocolat saveur Abricot

Milical Milical Go Repas Minceur Vanille 236ML

Milical Milical Go - Repas à boire chocolat

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas chocolat

Milical Milical Go - Coupelle repas vanille caramel

Milical Milical Go - Barres Repas Chocolat saveur Abricot

Milical Milical Go Repas Minceur Vanille 236ML

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs