Cucina Pizzateig + Tomatensauce · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Cucina Pizzateig + Tomatensauce packshot

Nutrition snapshot

Cucina Pizzateig + Tomatensauce

Name: Cucina Pizzateig + Tomatensauce
Brand: Cucina
SKU: 22125439

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Moderate signal

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from Cucina Suggest correction

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (34 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryMeal Kits

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity600 g

PackagingGlas, Pappe, Karton

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score58/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Pizzateig (67%): _Weizenmehl_, Trinkwasser, Rapsöl, Ethylalkohol, Speisesalz, Backtriebmittel: Diphosphate, Natriumcarbonate; Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl, Backhefe, Hefe Zubeeitete Tomatensoße (33%): Tomatenpüree mit kleinen Tomatenstückchen (92,7%), Sonnenblumenöl, Zwiebeln, Speisesalz, Kräuter (Oregano, Basilikum), weißer Pfeffer

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 58/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 87/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

58/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

64/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (34 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Casa Azzurra Atelier Pizza + Jambon cru Italien

Meal Kits. Ingredients: Pâte à pizza : farine de _blé_, eau, levain (farine de _blé_, eau), sel iodé, huile d’olive vierge extra, conservateurs : propionate de calcium, acide sorbique. Sauce tomate : Pulpe de tomate 60%, semi concentré de tomate 35 %, oignon déshydraté, huile de tournesol, sucre, sel, basilic, origan. Cubes de mozzarella et scamorza fumée : Mozzarella 84 % (_lait_, sel, coagulant microbien, ferments _lactiques_), Scamorza fumée 14 % (_lait_, sel, coagulant microbien, ferments _lactiques_), antiagglomérant : cellulose. Jambon cru italien : jambon de porc, sel, conservateur : nitrate de potassium.. Evidence quality: high

47/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

93/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

47/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

51/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Alter Eco RIZ THAI COCO CITRONELLE

Meal Kits. Ingredients: Riz thai blanc 85%, noix de coco* rapée 8%, citronnelle* séchée 4%, sel, menthe poivrée* séchée, zestes de citron kaffir graines de coriandre* poivre*.*Ingredients agricoles issus de l'agriculture biologique. Riz issu du commerce équitable certifié Fairtrade/Max Havelaar (85% du poids total).. Evidence quality: high

51/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

93/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

51/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Auchan Kit fajitas 8 galettes de blé + sauce cuisinée +sachet d'épices

Meal Kits. Ingredients: Galettes de blé (320 g): Farine de BLÉ 66%, eau, huile de colza, stabilisants : glycérol - carboxyméthylcellulose sodique - gomme guar poudres à lever : diphosphate disodique - carbonate acide de sodium, sel, acidifiant : acide malique, émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras, dextrose, conservateurs : sorbate de potassium - propionate de calcium, agent de traitement de la farine : L-cystéine. Sauce à base de tomate et de légumes (150 g): Tomates 34%, eau, oignons 11,7%, poivron rouge 7,8%, poivron vert 7,8%, concentré de tomates 5,8%, arômes, vinaigre d'alcool, sel, sucre, amidon modifié de riz, jus de citron concentré, antioxydant: acide ascorbique. Sachet d'assaisonnement (35g): chapelure (farine de BLÉ, sel, levure), maltodextrine, sel, épices (paprika, cumin), LACTOSE, oignon, ail, arômes naturels, acidifiant:acide citrique.. Evidence quality: high

64/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

88/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Camarillo Kit pour burritos

Meal Kits. Ingredients: Galettes de blé (320 g) : farine de blé 60%, eau, huile de colza, stabilisant : E422, sel, sucre, poudres à lever : E500-E450, acidifiant : E296, émulsifiant : E471, conservateurs : E282-E202, fibres de betterave. Sauce à base de tomate et autres légumes (150 g) : tomate 32%, eau, oignon 7%, vinaigre, haricot rouge 6%, purée de tomate 5%, haricot brun 5%, poivron rouge 3%, poivron vert 3%, amidon de riz modifié, sucre, arôme naturel oignon, mélange d'épices (paprika, piment, poivre, cumin), sel, ail en poudre, acidifiant : E330, antioxydant : E300. Assaisonnement (35 g) : sucre, paprika, cumin, sel, ail, oignon, origan, poivre noir, curcuma, piment cassé, piment, noix de muscade, cacao en poudre.. Evidence quality: high

53/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

80/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

53/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (34 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryMeal Kits

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity600 g

PackagingGlas, Pappe, Karton

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score58/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 58/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 87/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

58/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

64/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (34 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Similar options worth comparing

Casa Azzurra Atelier Pizza + Jambon cru Italien

47/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

93/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

47/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

51/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Alter Eco RIZ THAI COCO CITRONELLE

51/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

93/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

51/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Auchan Kit fajitas 8 galettes de blé + sauce cuisinée +sachet d'épices

64/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

88/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Camarillo Kit pour burritos

53/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

80/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

53/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Cucina Pizzateig + Tomatensauce

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 58/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Casa Azzurra Atelier Pizza + Jambon cru Italien

Alter Eco RIZ THAI COCO CITRONELLE

Auchan Kit fajitas 8 galettes de blé + sauce cuisinée +sachet d'épices

Camarillo Kit pour burritos

Cucina Pizzateig + Tomatensauce

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 58/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Casa Azzurra Atelier Pizza + Jambon cru Italien

Alter Eco RIZ THAI COCO CITRONELLE

Auchan Kit fajitas 8 galettes de blé + sauce cuisinée +sachet d'épices

Camarillo Kit pour burritos

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs