Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
55
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
367 kcal
Protein / 100g
13.3 g
Sugar / 100g
6.67 g
Ingredient-level explanation
ELBOW MACARONI, PINTO BEANS, TOMATO POWDER, SEA SALT, CHILI POWDER, FOOD STARCH, CHOPPED ONIONS, SUGAR, GARLIC GRANULES, CUMIN, BLACK PEPPER, CITRIC ACID, ONION POWDER
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
55
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Data confidence 50/100
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
55/100
55
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
34
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
68/100
68
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Fiber (11.7 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
High sodium content (1560 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (23 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
Source provenance supports confidence.
Impact: low
Related products
Food. Ingredients: Organic apples organic bananas. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
53
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
56/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Food. Ingredients: PRECOOKED RICE, IMITATION CHICKEN FLAVORED BITS, CHICKEN SOUP BASE, DEHYDRATED _BUTTER_ POWDER, SOUR CREAM POWDER, DEHYDRATED ONION, ONION POWDER, SEA SALT, SUGAR, GRANULATED GARLIC, PARSLEY FLAKES. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
45
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
53/100
medium reliability
Food. Ingredients: PINTO BEANS, ENRICHED PARBOILED WHITE RICE, KIDNEY BEANS, FOOD STARCH, CHOPPED ONIONS, SEA SALT, READ AND GREEN BELL PEPPERS, CELERY, TOMATO POWDER, CAJUN SEASONING, BAY LEAF, GARLIC GRANULES, OREGANO, THYME, BLACK PEPPER, CRUSHED BACON BUDS, SUGAR, SMOKE POWDER, CRUSHED RED PEPPER, CHIPOTLE PEPPER, CRUSHED TOBASCO POWDER. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
49
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
50/100
medium reliability
Food. Ingredients: PINTO BEANS, KIDNEY BEANS, TOMATO POWDER, SEA SALT, CHILI POWDER, ONIONS, CANE SUGAR, RED AND GREEN BELL PEPPERS, GARLIC GRANULES, FOOD STARCH, CUMIN, CITRIC ACID, BLACK PEPPER, SPICES. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
51
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
50/100
medium reliability
Kõrge soolasisaldus viitab suuremale naatriumikoormusele, mida tasub igapäevases tarbimises piirata.
Kohe
Võib suurendada janu ja mõnel inimesel soodustada vedelikupeetust.
Pikemas vaates
Sage liigne soolatarbimine seostub kõrgema vererõhu riskiga.
Loogika: salt100g > 1.2 g/100 g.
Signaalid: Sool 3.9 g/100 g ületab lävendi 1.2 g/100 g.
Tegu on riskisignaaliga, mitte meditsiinilise hinnanguga. Oluline on kogu päeva soolakoormus.
Kui soola on palju, suunab rakendus vanema tähelepanu lapse päevase soolakoormuse ja maitseharjumuste kujunemisele.
Miks oluline
Lapse toitumises tasub väga soolaseid valikuid piirata, sest harjumused kujunevad varakult ja mõjutavad ka hilisemat eelistust.
Kohe
Võib tekkida tugevam janu ja soov juua rohkem.
Pikemas vaates
Võib toetada soolasema maitse eelistust ja ebasoodsat vererõhu riskisuunda.
Põhineb tugeval rahvusvahelisel juhisel: WHO naatriumisoovitused (lastel kohandatakse vajadus allapoole).
Signaalid: Sool 3.9 g/100 g ületab lävendi 1.2 g/100 g.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage