Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
53
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
357 kcal
Protein / 100g
0 g
Sugar / 100g
57.14 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Organic apples organic bananas
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
53
/100
Nutrition profile
processing is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Processing
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Data confidence 56/100
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
53/100
53
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Minimally processed
Minimally processed · Limited estimate
100
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
70/100
70
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Fiber (14.3 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
High sugar content (57.14 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: high
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.
Impact: low
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
Related products
Food. Ingredients: PRECOOKED RICE, IMITATION CHICKEN FLAVORED BITS, CHICKEN SOUP BASE, DEHYDRATED _BUTTER_ POWDER, SOUR CREAM POWDER, DEHYDRATED ONION, ONION POWDER, SEA SALT, SUGAR, GRANULATED GARLIC, PARSLEY FLAKES. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
45
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
53/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Food. Ingredients: ELBOW MACARONI, PINTO BEANS, TOMATO POWDER, SEA SALT, CHILI POWDER, FOOD STARCH, CHOPPED ONIONS, SUGAR, GARLIC GRANULES, CUMIN, BLACK PEPPER, CITRIC ACID, ONION POWDER. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
55
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
50/100
medium reliability
Food. Ingredients: PINTO BEANS, ENRICHED PARBOILED WHITE RICE, KIDNEY BEANS, FOOD STARCH, CHOPPED ONIONS, SEA SALT, READ AND GREEN BELL PEPPERS, CELERY, TOMATO POWDER, CAJUN SEASONING, BAY LEAF, GARLIC GRANULES, OREGANO, THYME, BLACK PEPPER, CRUSHED BACON BUDS, SUGAR, SMOKE POWDER, CRUSHED RED PEPPER, CHIPOTLE PEPPER, CRUSHED TOBASCO POWDER. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
49
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
50/100
medium reliability
Food. Ingredients: PINTO BEANS, KIDNEY BEANS, TOMATO POWDER, SEA SALT, CHILI POWDER, ONIONS, CANE SUGAR, RED AND GREEN BELL PEPPERS, GARLIC GRANULES, FOOD STARCH, CUMIN, CITRIC ACID, BLACK PEPPER, SPICES. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
51
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
50/100
medium reliability
Kõrge vabade suhkrute sisaldus võib tõsta energiakoormust ilma püsivat täiskõhutunnet pakkumata.
Kohe
Võib tekitada kiire energiakõikumise ning varasema näljatunde või suurema janu.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsale kehakaalu ja ainevahetuse profiilile.
Loogika: Joogid: sugars100g > 5 g/100 ml. Toidud: sugars100g > 10 g/100 g.
Signaalid: Suhkur 57.1 g/100 g ületab toidule rakendatud lävendi 10 g/100 g.
See on riskisignaal, mitte diagnoos. Mõju sõltub kogusest, tarbimissagedusest ja kogu toitumismustrist.
Kui toidus on palju vabu suhkruid, võib see lapse puhul nõrgendada täiskõhutunnet ja toetada sagedamat magusaisu.
Miks oluline
Rakendus tõstab selle esile, sest laste toitumises mõjutab sage kõrge suhkrukoormus nii päevast söömismustrit kui ka hambatervise riski.
Kohe
Võib tekkida varasem uus näljatunne või suurem janu pärast magusat toidukorda.
Pikemas vaates
Võib kujundada magusamaid maitse-eelistusi ja vähendada menüü üldist toitumiskvaliteeti.
Põhineb tugeval rahvusvahelisel juhisel: WHO soovitab lastel piirata vabu suhkruid (kaariese ja liigse energiatarbimise riskisuund).
Signaalid: Suhkur 57.1 g/100 g ületab toidule rakendatud lävendi 10 g/100 g.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage