Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
24
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Extrait sec de glucose, sel, sucre, glutamate monosodique, huile de canola, gras de poulet, farine de blé, amidon de maïs, poudre d'oignon, protéines végétales hydrolysées (soya), dextrose, épices, persil deshydraté, colorant caramel, extraits d'épices, bioxyde de silicium, inosinate disodique, guanylate disodique
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
24
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 90/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result points to clear risk and low quality.
Nutrition profile
Very weak
24/100
24
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
12
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
51/100
51
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as guanülaat support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products
Broths. Ingredients: Coquillages (44%): extrait de Clams d'Islande, chair d'amande, chair de poisson ; extrait de levure, fibres de _blé_, antioxydant : extraits riches en tocophérols.. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
79/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Broths. Ingredients: Crustacés : 53% (extrait de langoustine, crevette), chair de poisson, extrait de levure, légumes (tomate, oignon), sel, sucre, fibres de blé, antioxydants : extraits riches en tocophérols.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
69
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
88/100
high reliability
Broths. Ingredients: Sel-Amidon de maïs - Arôme (Contient exhausteurs de goût : E621, E627, E631) (Soja hydrolysat de protéines de soja - Exhausteur de goût: E621 - Sucre - Huile de colza-Sirop de glucose de maïs-Viande de poule Halal 1% - Oignon - Epices - Persil.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
35
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
87/100
high reliability
Broths. Ingredients: Eau, sel, arômes naturels, huile de tournesol, sucre, extrait de levure, carotte, extrait de viande 1,5% (bœuf origine Brésil, Uruguay), épaississants: agar-agar, gomme xanthane légumes (oignon, CÉLERI, poireau, chou, persil), sucre caramelisé, acidifiant: acide lactique. Traces éventuelles de gluten, lait.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
73
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
90/100
high reliability
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage