Gallina Blanca
6412365641721
Broths. Evidence quality: medium
Nutri-ScoreCBroths
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Gallina Blanca
Broths. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Gallina Blanca
Broths. Ingredients: druska, kukurūzų krakmolas, aromato ir skonio stiprikliai (E621, E635), augaliniai palmių riebalai, maltodekstrinas, cukrus, vištiniai riebalai, augalinių baltymų ekstraktas (yra _kviečių_), kvapiosios medžiagos (yra _sojų_, _pieno_, _kiaušinių_), vištiena 0.4%, prieskoniai, daržovės (petražolės, _salierai_, svogūnai, morkos), dažiklis (riboflavinas). Produkte gali būti _žuvies_, _vėžiagyvių_, _moliuskų_ pėdsakai.. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Ariake
Broths. Ingredients: Crustacés : 53% (extrait de langoustine, crevette), chair de poisson, extrait de levure, légumes (tomate, oignon), sel, sucre, fibres de blé, antioxydants : extraits riches en tocophérols.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Ariaké
Broths. Ingredients: Coquillages (44%): extrait de Clams d'Islande, chair d'amande, chair de poisson ; extrait de levure, fibres de _blé_, antioxydant : extraits riches en tocophérols.. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
65/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Processing unknown
Insufficient evidence
Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
67/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.