Search catalog

Unilever Langnese Twister Mallow · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Unilever Langnese Twister Mallow packshot

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Moderate signal

Unilever Langnese Twister Mallow

Name: Unilever Langnese Twister Mallow
Brand: Unilever
SKU: 8711327661509

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4

Lisaained:5 tk

Andmete katvus:85%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (59 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score64/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Vesi, sokeri, glukoosisiirappi, hedelmäsokeri, vadelmasose (2.5%), omenasose (2.5%), rypälemehu tiivisteestä (2.5%), maissikuitu, kookosrasva, happamuudensäätöaine (sitruunahappo), väri (antosyaanit), punajuurimehutiiviste, stabilointiaineet (guarkumi, johanneksenleipäpuujauhe, tarakumi), herneproteiini (0,1%), mustaporkkanatiiviste, safloritiiviste, aromit, emulgointiaineet (rasvahappojen mono - ja diglyseridit [kasviperäinen]), suola. Saattaa sisältää MAITOA ja MANTELIA *Hedelmä soseesta ja hedelmämehu tiivisteestä.

Tuvastatud lisaained (5)

E163 E330 E412 E417 E471

Product & Packaging

CategorySnacks

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity73 g / 80 ml

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

64/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 64/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (59 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts

4740093942509

Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

Snacks

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Mio & rio

Šokoladinis plombyras su šokolado gabaliukais vafliniame puodelyje

Snacks. Ingredients: Nenugriebtas PIENAS (ne mažiau kaip bku [LT] Sokoladinis plombyras su šokolado gabaliukais vafliniame bia 49 %), cukrus, SVIESTAS, vanduo, vaflinis puodelis (7,7 %) (KVIETINIAI miltai, Dkukurūzų krakmolas, augaliniai riebalai (rapsy), SOJŲ baltymų koncentratas, emulsiklis SOJŲ lecitinai, tešlos kildymo medžiaga natrio karbonatai, druska, cukrus), šokolado gabaliukai (3 %) (cukrus, kakavos mase, kakavos Sviestas", emulsiklis SOJŲ lecitinai), gliukozės sirupas, kakavos milteliai (2.2 %), nugriebto PIENO milteliai, ISRUGU milteliai (iš PIENO), emulsiklis riebalų rūgščių mono - ir digliceridai, stabilizatoriai (saldžiųjų ceratonijų derva, pupenių derva, karageninas), kvapioji medžiaga. Kakavos sausuju medžiagų šokolade ne mažiau kaip 40 %. Gali būti RIEŠUTŲ ir ZEMES RIEŠUTU pedsaky.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Minimelts

Big Sorbet Mango

Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

Plant-based

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Gelatelli

Strawberry Crisp

Snacks. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreESnacks

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (59 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score64/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (5)

E163 E330 E412 E417 E471

Product & Packaging

CategorySnacks

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity73 g / 80 ml

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

64/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 64/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

64/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (59 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Unilever Langnese Twister Mallow

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 64/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

4740093942509

Šokoladinis plombyras su šokolado gabaliukais vafliniame puodelyje

Big Sorbet Mango

Strawberry Crisp

Unilever Langnese Twister Mallow

Similar options worth comparing

4740093942509

Šokoladinis plombyras su šokolado gabaliukais vafliniame puodelyje

Big Sorbet Mango

Strawberry Crisp

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 64/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs