Need attention
- Added sugars are unavailable, so sugar handling relies conservatively on total sugars.
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Energy / 100g
100 kcal
Protein / 100g
2.9 g
Sugar / 100g
2 g
Ingredient-level explanation
milest suhkud/iš kurių cukrų/tostarp cukuri inatpireepulber (4,8%6), sulatatud juustu pulber (3,2%) (mozzarella JUUST, JUUST, vadakupulber PI 100 g1 portsjonis*%* portsjonis/ miler kilstnud rasvhapped/iš kurių sočiujų lali 0,156), sbulapulber, vũrtsid (pipar, kurkum', peterselljuure pulber), kaaliumkorid, pämieksmai koalts Va saturét sjas pupinas, selerijas un sinepes. EE: Rebi siit ja taaskasuta retaly rigsčiy/tostarp piesātinātās taukskābes Elostiosad asta (29%) (kôva NISUMANNA, kuivatatud MUNAVALGE), kartulitärkis, KOOREPULBER pie Siveskud /Angliavandeniai /Oglhidräti LV. Sastavdalas: makaroni (62%) (cieto KVIEŠU mannas putraimi, OLAS balhuna puhesi a BOT saulespuku sēklu ella, tomätu biezeņa pulveris (4,8%), kausētā siera pulveris 3 LV: Lai šķirotu, plēst šeit ite pmatseained (ssaldab NISU, ÓTRA), jodeeritud sool, LAKTOOS, sool, PIIMAVALK, ürdid petesel pu yesi (0,15%), baziliks (0,15%), sipolu pulveris, garšvielas (pipari kurkuma salou einsa podukts (PIENS), glikozes sirups, aromatizētāji (satur KVIEŠUS, MIEŽUSI jodės sa ATE LT: Nuplėšk ir rūšiuoki porcijoje** porcijä**
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
65/100
Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed · Limited estimate
Highly processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Quite good
66/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
79/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as kurkuma support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (52 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 89%.
Impact: medium
The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.
Impact: low
Added sugars are unavailable, so sugar handling relies conservatively on total sugars.
Impact: low
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.