Search catalog

Maggi AŠTRIOS VIŠTIENOS SKONIO AR PIKANTU VISTAS GAĻAS GARŠU VŪRTSIKAD KANAMAITSELISED · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Maggi AŠTRIOS VIŠTIENOS SKONIO AR PIKANTU VISTAS GAĻAS GARŠU VŪRTSIKAD KANAMAITSELISED packshot

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Moderate signal

Maggi AŠTRIOS VIŠTIENOS SKONIO AR PIKANTU VISTAS GAĻAS GARŠU VŪRTSIKAD KANAMAITSELISED

Name: Maggi AŠTRIOS VIŠTIENOS SKONIO AR PIKANTU VISTAS GAĻAS GARŠU VŪRTSIKAD KANAMAITSELISED
Brand: Maggi
SKU: 7613037096163

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreC

Lisaained:0 lisaainet

Andmete katvus:61%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

High sugar content (23.7 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.

What would improve the assessment

Processing classification needs a fuller ingredient list and any declared NOVA information.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing an ingredient list.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Energy / 100g

446 kcal

Protein / 100g

10.3 g

Sugar / 100g

23.7 g

Nutrition score55/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.

Product & Packaging

CategoryMeals

Label information quality66/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Insufficient evidence

Environmental Impact

Environmental signal

Nutrition score

55/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 55/100

Mixed

environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Environmental signal

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

55/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

NOVA —

Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

66/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

High sugar content (23.7 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, fiber per 100g, ingredients or ingredients, NOVA group, quantity, ingredients, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Лента

Ролл Цезарь

Meals. Ingredients: Тортилья (мука пшенич.в/ с вода, соль, дрожжи, сахар, консервантЕ282), стрипсы (филе куриное, молоко, яйцо, паниров. смесь (мука, крахмал кукурузный, соль, яичн. продукты, компл. пищ. добавка(соль, сахар, загустител ь мальтодекстрин, ароматизатор экстракт чеснока), ароматизаторы, красители:Е100,E160; усилитель вкуса/ аромата 621), масло растительное, перец красный острый,соль), соус чесночный (майонез (масло подсолнечное, вода, регулятор кислотностиЕ260, крахмал кукурузный, яичный продукт, загустители:E415,E412; соль, консерванты: Е200,E385; ароматизато р Горчица, подсластители:E950,E951; краситель E160), сметана, перец черный, чеснок, соль, укроп)), капуста китайская, помидор. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Selver

Makaroni-singisalat

Meals. Ingredients: MAKARON 35% [MAKARON sh NISU, rapsiõli], majonees [rapsiõli, vesi, LÖSSIpulber, suhkur, sool, SINEPIpulber, modifitseeritud tärklis, paksendajad (E415, E412), MUNApulber, happesuse regulaator E260, säilitusaine E202], sink 16% [sealiha, vesi, tärklis, sool, glükoos, stabilisaatorid (E450, E451), modifitseeritud tärklis, maitsetaimed, vürtsid, paksendaja E407, lõhna - ja maitseaine, antioksüdant E316, toiduvärv E120, säilitusaine E250], marineeritud kurk sh SINEP, keedetud porgand, sool, suhkur, maitsetaimed, maltodekstriin, glükoos, lõhna - ja maitseaine, vürtsid, SELLERIekstrakt. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA4Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

HoviRuoka

Vihispizza

Meals. Ingredients: VEHNÄjauho, vesi, kasvisseos (tomaatti, porkkana, sipuli, paprika, purjo, valkosipuli), tomaattimurska (tomaatti, tomaattitäysmehu, happamuudensäätöaine (sitruunahappo)), tomaattikastike (tomaattipyree ja - murska, vesi, sokeri, suola, etikka, rapsiöljy, mustapippuri, säilöntäineet (E202, E211), teksturoitu vehnä (vehnäjauho, väri E150c), rapsiöljy, vegaaninen raaste (vesi, kookosöljy, modifioitu perunatärkkelys, merisuola, modifioitu tapiokatärkkelys, vegaaninen mauste, oliivi - ja pihlaja-aromi, väri (betakaroteeni)), sokeri, suola, vehnäraski (kuivattu vehnähapantaikina), mausteseos (mm. paprika, kurkuma, oregano), tärkkelys (modifioitu perunatärkkelys(E1422), maltodextriini), säilöntäaine (E202). Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Lidl

Lasagne Carbonara

Meals. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreCMeals

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Similar options worth comparing

Лента

Ролл Цезарь

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Selver

Makaroni-singisalat

NOVA4Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

HoviRuoka

Vihispizza

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Lidl

Lasagne Carbonara

Meals. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreCMeals

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

High sugar content (23.7 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.

What would improve the assessment

Processing classification needs a fuller ingredient list and any declared NOVA information.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing an ingredient list.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Energy / 100g

446 kcal

Protein / 100g

10.3 g

Sugar / 100g

23.7 g

Nutrition score55/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.

Product & Packaging

CategoryMeals

Label information quality66/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Insufficient evidence

Environmental Impact

Environmental signal

Nutrition score

55/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 55/100

Mixed

environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Environmental signal

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

55/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

NOVA —

Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

66/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

High sugar content (23.7 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high

Maggi AŠTRIOS VIŠTIENOS SKONIO AR PIKANTU VISTAS GAĻAS GARŠU VŪRTSIKAD KANAMAITSELISED

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Environmental Impact

Nutrition score 55/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Ролл Цезарь

Makaroni-singisalat

Vihispizza

Lasagne Carbonara

Maggi AŠTRIOS VIŠTIENOS SKONIO AR PIKANTU VISTAS GAĻAS GARŠU VŪRTSIKAD KANAMAITSELISED

Similar options worth comparing

Ролл Цезарь

Makaroni-singisalat

Vihispizza

Lasagne Carbonara

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Environmental Impact

Nutrition score 55/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Kõrge vabade suhkrute sisaldus

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Kõrge vabade suhkrute sisaldus lapse toidus