The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Veganic
Meat Alternatives. Ingredients: Water, wheat flour, rapeseed oil, lentil flour, baked eggplant, durum wheat flour, sunflower seed, vinegar, textured pea, beetroot powder, spices and flavorings, salt, sugar. May contain traces of soy, celery, sesame, mustard.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Valio
Meat Alternatives. Ingredients: Vesi, gluteeniton kauralese 15 %, herneproteiini, härkäpapuproteiini, mausteet (sipuli, paprika, valkosipuli, tomaattijauhe, basilika, mustapippuri, maustepippuri, oregano, cayennepippuri), aromit, fariinisokeri, melassi, jodioitu suola, suola.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Härkis
Meat Alternatives. Ingredients: Vesi, gluteeniton kauralese 15 %, herneproteiini, härkäpapuproteiini, mausteet (paprika, sipuli, tomaattijauhe, valkosipuli, juustokumina, chili, korianteri, oregano), aromit, sokeri, melassi, jodioitu suola.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Sofine Food
Meat Alternatives. Ingredients: soy protein. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
252 kcal
Protein / 100g
8.3 g
Sugar / 100g
3.3 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Kikerter 62% (USA), søtpoteter16% (Spanien), rapsolje (til fritering), løk, potetflak chipotlekrydder (paprika, anchopeppar, chipotle, røkt paprika, vegetabilisk buljong, cayennepepper), salt, bakepulver: natriumbikarbonat, konserveringsmiddel: kaliumsorbat.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
58/100
Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
Highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Weak
32/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
High sodium content (480 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (44 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 78%.
Impact: medium
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
