The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Brutaria traditionala
Snacks. Ingredients: Fäinä superioară rau, sare. zahar, drojdie, grasimi vegetale nehidrogenate. aud, lapin, statale, brbuzh vel 40%, aroma. Centine: gluten, cul, lapta.. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Nordthy
Snacks. Ingredients: Süßungsmitteln (E965, E960a), 2,2% Ammoniumchlorid, Süßholzpulver, Säureregulator (E296) Salz, Farbstoffe (E120, E131, E153, E160a), Aromen, Paprika. Kann Spuren von Soja und Milch enthalten. Mit Süßungs - mitteln, kann bei übermäßigem Verzehr abführend wirken. Wir empfehlen nicht mehr als 20g pro Tag. Erwachsenenlakritz. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Cloetta
Snacks. Ingredients: Sweeteners (xylitol 35%, sorbitol, mannitol, acesulfame K, sucralose), chewing gum base mass, flavourings, acidity regulators (citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid), humectant (glycerol), emulsifier (lecithins), antioxidant (BHT).. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Taffel
Snacks. Ingredients: Corn flour, vegetable oils (sunflower, rapeseed), spice mix (maltodextrin (from maize or potato), CHEESE POWDER (EU), CREAM POWDER, flavour enhancer (E621, E635), salt, dextrose, flavouring, tomato, glucose syrup, sugar, aroma, potassium chloride, spice extract (paprika, cayenne pepper), onion, acidity regulator (citric acid WHEY POWDER (from MILK)). May contain traces of WHEAT. Gluten free. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
516 kcal
Protein / 100g
5.7 g
Sugar / 100g
2.9 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
71/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Processing unknown
Insufficient evidence
Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
74/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Fiber (5.2 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing ingredient evidence.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
