Search catalog

Open Food Facts mansikka pitko · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Signal unavailable

Open Food Facts mansikka pitko

Name: Open Food Facts mansikka pitko
Brand: Open Food Facts
SKU: 6438565125670

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

NOVA4

Lisaained:14 tk

Andmete katvus:57%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as karboksümetüültselluloos (E466), modifitseeritud tärklis support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (66 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (38%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

3 19 KPL 9.116/KG [FI] PULLAPITKO, JOSSA VANILJANMAKUINEN KREEMI (15%) JA BULLÄNGD MED MANSIKKATÄYTE (13%). LAKTOOSITON. AINESOSAT: vehnäjauho, vaniljan - FYLLNING (13%). makuinen kreemi (Espanja) [vesi, sokeri, glukoosi-fruktoosisiirappi, muunnettu kram (Spanien) [v tärkkelys (E1442), värit (E160a, E101), stabilointiaineet (E460, E516, E466), (E1442), (ärgämner suola, säilöntäaine (E202), happamuudensäätöaineet (E330, E332ii), aromi, konserveringsmed mansikkatäyte 13 % (Viro) [vesi, sokeri, mansikka, glukoosi-fruktoosisiirappi, jordgubbsfyllning sakeuttamisaineet (E1442, E418), happamuudensäätöaineet (E330, E333), sirap, förtjocknings mustaporkkanatiiviste, aromit, säilöntäaine (E202)] sokeri, vesi, margariini svartmorotkonce (rapsiöljy, vesi, suola, aromi), hiiva, kananmuna, jodioitu suola, kardemumma, margarin (rapso kiille [maitoproteiini, happamuudensäätöaineet (E500i, E339iii)], säilöntäaine glasyr [mjölkp (E202), jauhonparanne (E300). Tuote sisältää 2,7 % mansikkaa. SÄILYTYS: ringsmedel (E20 huoneenlämmössä valolta suojattuna. PR

Tuvastatud lisaained (15)

E101 E1442 E160A E202 E300 E330 E332 E333 E339 E418 E460 E466 E500 E500I E516

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality60/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

100

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

60/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (38%).
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as karboksümetüültselluloos (E466), modifitseeritud tärklis support a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, quantity, category, nutrition panel, allergens, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as karboksümetüültselluloos (E466), modifitseeritud tärklis support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (66 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (38%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (15)

E101 E1442 E160A E202 E300 E330 E332 E333 E339 E418 E460 E466 E500 E500I E516

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality60/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

100

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

60/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (38%).
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as karboksümetüültselluloos (E466), modifitseeritud tärklis support a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Open Food Facts mansikka pitko

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Open Food Facts mansikka pitko

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs