Search catalog

Puhdistamo Elektrolyyttijauhe Metsän Marjat · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Puhdistamo Elektrolyyttijauhe Metsän Marjat packshot

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Low signal

Puhdistamo Elektrolyyttijauhe Metsän Marjat

Name: Puhdistamo Elektrolyyttijauhe Metsän Marjat
Brand: Puhdistamo
SKU: 6430039222557

The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreBNOVA4

Lisaained:0 lisaainet

Andmete katvus:75%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Non-sugar sweeteners (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Formulation markers such as stevioolglükosiidid support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (15 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Uncertain or missing data

The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score73/100 · Grade B

Ingredient-level explanation

Metyylisulfonyylimetaani (OptiMSM), Guérande-merisuola, kaliumbitartraatti, happamoodensäätöaine (omenahappo), magnesiummalaatti, kalsiumaskorbaatti, maketusaine (stevioliglykosidit) luontainen aromi, retiisitiiviste, mustaherukkatiiviste, omenatiiviste, natriumbikarbonaatti

Product & Packaging

CategoryDietary Supplements

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity120g

PackagingPlastic, Glass

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

73/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 73/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Very highly processed · Limited estimate

Very highly processed

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

55/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Non-sugar sweeteners (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as stevioolglükosiidid support a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
Record completeness is 67%.
Impact: medium

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, fiber per 100g, protein per 100g, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Iconfit

Soy protein isolate

Dietary Supplements. Ingredients: Soy protein isolate. GMO-free! Country of origin: China, quality control performed in Europe. ICONFIT.EU. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA3Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Bulk

Pure Whey Protein

Dietary Supplements. Ingredients: Whey Protein Concentrate (Milk), Emulsifier (Sunflower Lecithin), Flavourings, Thickener (Xanthan Gum), Sweetener (Sucralose).. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA4Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Puls Nutrition

Double Chocolate Whey Protein Powder

Dietary Supplements. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

Dietary Supplements

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

ColonBroom

GLP-1

Dietary Supplements. Ingredients: Hypromellose, Microcrystalline Cellulose, Magnesium Stearate, Silicone Dioxide, MICO oil, Zinc, berberis aristata bark extract, polygonum, cuspidatum root extract, quercetin dehydrate. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Non-sugar sweeteners (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Formulation markers such as stevioolglükosiidid support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (15 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Uncertain or missing data

The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score73/100 · Grade B

Ingredient-level explanation

Product & Packaging

CategoryDietary Supplements

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity120g

PackagingPlastic, Glass

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

73/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 73/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Very highly processed · Limited estimate

Very highly processed

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

55/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Non-sugar sweeteners (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as stevioolglükosiidid support a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
Record completeness is 67%.
Impact: medium

Puhdistamo Elektrolyyttijauhe Metsän Marjat

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 73/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Soy protein isolate

Pure Whey Protein

Double Chocolate Whey Protein Powder

GLP-1

Puhdistamo Elektrolyyttijauhe Metsän Marjat

Similar options worth comparing

Soy protein isolate

Pure Whey Protein

Double Chocolate Whey Protein Powder

GLP-1

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 73/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Mittesuhkrulised magusained

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Mittesuhkrulised magusained lapse valikus