The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Brutaria traditionala
Snacks. Ingredients: Fäinä superioară rau, sare. zahar, drojdie, grasimi vegetale nehidrogenate. aud, lapin, statale, brbuzh vel 40%, aroma. Centine: gluten, cul, lapta.. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Nordthy
Snacks. Ingredients: Süßungsmitteln (E965, E960a), 2,2% Ammoniumchlorid, Süßholzpulver, Säureregulator (E296) Salz, Farbstoffe (E120, E131, E153, E160a), Aromen, Paprika. Kann Spuren von Soja und Milch enthalten. Mit Süßungs - mitteln, kann bei übermäßigem Verzehr abführend wirken. Wir empfehlen nicht mehr als 20g pro Tag. Erwachsenenlakritz. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Cloetta
Snacks. Ingredients: Sweeteners (xylitol 35%, sorbitol, mannitol, acesulfame K, sucralose), chewing gum base mass, flavourings, acidity regulators (citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid), humectant (glycerol), emulsifier (lecithins), antioxidant (BHT).. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Taffel
Snacks. Ingredients: Corn flour, vegetable oils (sunflower, rapeseed), spice mix (maltodextrin (from maize or potato), CHEESE POWDER (EU), CREAM POWDER, flavour enhancer (E621, E635), salt, dextrose, flavouring, tomato, glucose syrup, sugar, aroma, potassium chloride, spice extract (paprika, cayenne pepper), onion, acidity regulator (citric acid WHEY POWDER (from MILK)). May contain traces of WHEAT. Gluten free. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Luomumaissi, luomu auringonkukkaöljy, tiamiini.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
69/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
Highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
79/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
