Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.
Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Compozitie: Ulei de ricin 20 g Actiune: Stimulator al peristaltismului intestinului subtire. Indicatii: Constipatie acut. Bine suportat de copii, debili, batr�ni, convalesceni. Mod de utilizare: Adulti-oral, 1-2 linguri pe zi. Pentru a evita gustul neplacut se ia �n prealabil suc de lam�ie sau portocal. Prezentare: Flacon cu 20 g Ulei de Ricin.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
processing is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Processing
Weakest area
Label quality
Data confidence
low
Data confidence
Low reliability
Data coverage is limited and the result should be interpreted with caution.
Category breakdown
The data does not support a reliable overall result.
Nutrition profile
No reliable assessment
—
Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
Moderately processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
No reliable assessment
—
Environmental signal is unavailable because metadata are too sparse.
Label quality
Mixed
48/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
Data is limited. The result should be treated as an initial indication rather than a final assessment.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (38%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (15 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Environmental data coverage is too weak for a reliable indicator.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.