Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.
Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
invert sugar (to obtain maximum raw sugar 64%, purified water and citric acid) - plantain (Plantago lanceolata) - leaves (30%) - hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis) - aerial parts (20%) - mallow (Althaea officinalis) - roots (20%) - cuckoo (Primula officinalis) - flowers (10%) - game (Eryngium planum) - aerial parts (10%) - ginger (Zingiber officinale) - hydroalcoholic extract with 2.5% gingerols from rhizomes - licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) - roots (5%) - essential oils (0.01%) of: mint-mint (Mentha crispa); eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus); thyme (Thymus vulgaris); pine (Pinus sylvestris) and rhinoceros (Melissa officinalis) Plant / water ratio 1:10.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The data does not support a reliable overall result.
Nutrition profile
No reliable assessment
—
Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed · Limited estimate
Highly processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
No reliable assessment
—
Environmental signal is unavailable because metadata are too sparse.
Label quality
Mixed
48/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (38%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Environmental data coverage is too weak for a reliable indicator.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.