Search catalog

Midar Group Montana tableta de post · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Midar Group Montana tableta de post packshot

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Signal unavailable

Midar Group Montana tableta de post

Name: Midar Group Montana tableta de post
Brand: Midar Group
SKU: 6420289101603

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

NOVA4

Lisaained:2 tk

Andmete katvus:76%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

Uncertain or missing data

Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as letsitiin (E322) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (49 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Tableta (70%): zahar, grăsimi vegetale de palmier, pudrà de cacao, emulsifiant lecitiná din SOIA (E322), aromă vanilie. Continut de substanță uscată cacao: min. 28% gema (30%): zahár, sirop de glucoză, ulešuri vegetale de palmier, foarea-soarelui, alcool etilic rafinat (1,6%), aromă portocale, pulbere portocale 0,02%, gelifiant (pectina), acidifiant (aod dtric). Alergen: SOLA. Poate contine urme de alune, arahide si produse derivate. Informatii nutritionale / 100 g Valoare energetica Grasimi din care Acizi graşi saturati Glucide din care Zaharuri Proteine Sare 2144 3/512 kca 28g 27g 599 529 49g 049 A se consuma de preferința inainte de: (vezi pe ambalaj) 2813 /PAP 50 ge Produs realizat Intr-un sistem de management al siguranței alimentului certificat in conformitate cu SR EN 22 000. Tara de origine: ROMÂNA Produs de: SC MIDAR GROUP SRL, SAT ROSU, COM. CHIAJNA, STR. 1 DECEMBRIE1918, NR. 61, ILFOV. Ase pästra la temperatura de max 23C și umiditate 85%

Tuvastatud lisaained (2)

E322 E440

Product & Packaging

CategorySweeteners

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity50 g

Packaging22 PAP

OriginsRomania

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

60/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as letsitiin (E322) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (49 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts

6420396004217

Sweeteners. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

Sweeteners

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts

6420396004231

Sweeteners. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

Sweeteners

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Nordicsugar.dk

4770074522956

Sweeteners. Ingredients: Økologisk rørsukker.. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA2Lower processing burden

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Xylimax

Xylimax Mints Menthol & Mint

Sweeteners. Ingredients: Sweetener (xylitol (incl. xylitol from oats)) 94%, firming agents (E470a, E466), thickener (E414), natural flavourings, glazing agent (E903). Excessive consumption may produce laxative effects. Gluten free.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

Uncertain or missing data

Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as letsitiin (E322) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (49 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (2)

E322 E440

Product & Packaging

CategorySweeteners

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity50 g

Packaging22 PAP

OriginsRomania

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

60/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as letsitiin (E322) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (49 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Midar Group Montana tableta de post

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

6420396004217

6420396004231

4770074522956

Xylimax Mints Menthol & Mint

Midar Group Montana tableta de post

Similar options worth comparing

6420396004217

6420396004231

4770074522956

Xylimax Mints Menthol & Mint

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs