Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.



Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
ro em pó, sal, emulsionante (lecitina de soja), conter frutos de casca rija, amêndoas e cereais que je cacau, no minima, armazenar em locall sero e nlândia, carboidrati/hin soro de leite em pós barnexuapari davon zucker di cui zuccher sugars on eiweiß/baltyma proteins seen salz/druska/sa annos 7,8g pakw portion 760 forg lue lisaaa read more abou {kchocolade, ingredienten: glucosesiroop, suiker cacaoboter, weipoeder (van melk), cacaomassa, (sojalecithine), geur - of smaakstoffen (karamel, mproducten met gluten bevatten, in melkchocolade op een droge en koele plek,producent: fazer e coating milk chocolate, ingredients: syrup www,forbettere ms), whole milk powder, cocoa butter, serum tomassa, skimmed milk powder, salt, ,), flavorings (caramel, vanillin), can dalas and cereals containing gluten, 2017450 6 416453 038509 as p 270 fazer mak p,o, box 1 00101 hel www,faze
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The data does not support a reliable overall result.
Nutrition profile
No reliable assessment
—
Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed · Limited estimate
Highly processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
74/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (45 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.