Search catalog

Rainbow Juustopasta-ateria · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Signal unavailable

Rainbow Juustopasta-ateria

Name: Rainbow Juustopasta-ateria
Brand: Rainbow
SKU: 6415712601379

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

NOVA4

Lisaained:2 tk

Andmete katvus:53%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (49 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Pasta 72% (_durumvehnä_), palmurasva, riisijauho, juustojauhe 3,5% (_juusto_, emulgointiaine (E 339)), suola, herajauhe (_maito_), perunatärkkelys, _maitosokeri_, glukoosisiirappi, _maitoproteiini_, hiivauute, maltodekstriini, valkosipuli, mausteyrtit ja mausteet (mm. persilja), aromi, dekstroosi, sokeri, sipuli, väri (E 160c).

Tuvastatud lisaained (2)

E160C E339

Product & Packaging

CategoryMeals

Label information quality72/100

Data confidence

Quantity160g

PackagingKomposiitti

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

72/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (49 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Лента

Ролл Цезарь

Meals. Ingredients: Тортилья (мука пшенич.в/ с вода, соль, дрожжи, сахар, консервантЕ282), стрипсы (филе куриное, молоко, яйцо, паниров. смесь (мука, крахмал кукурузный, соль, яичн. продукты, компл. пищ. добавка(соль, сахар, загустител ь мальтодекстрин, ароматизатор экстракт чеснока), ароматизаторы, красители:Е100,E160; усилитель вкуса/ аромата 621), масло растительное, перец красный острый,соль), соус чесночный (майонез (масло подсолнечное, вода, регулятор кислотностиЕ260, крахмал кукурузный, яичный продукт, загустители:E415,E412; соль, консерванты: Е200,E385; ароматизато р Горчица, подсластители:E950,E951; краситель E160), сметана, перец черный, чеснок, соль, укроп)), капуста китайская, помидор. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Selver

Makaroni-singisalat

Meals. Ingredients: MAKARON 35% [MAKARON sh NISU, rapsiõli], majonees [rapsiõli, vesi, LÖSSIpulber, suhkur, sool, SINEPIpulber, modifitseeritud tärklis, paksendajad (E415, E412), MUNApulber, happesuse regulaator E260, säilitusaine E202], sink 16% [sealiha, vesi, tärklis, sool, glükoos, stabilisaatorid (E450, E451), modifitseeritud tärklis, maitsetaimed, vürtsid, paksendaja E407, lõhna - ja maitseaine, antioksüdant E316, toiduvärv E120, säilitusaine E250], marineeritud kurk sh SINEP, keedetud porgand, sool, suhkur, maitsetaimed, maltodekstriin, glükoos, lõhna - ja maitseaine, vürtsid, SELLERIekstrakt. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA4Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

HoviRuoka

Vihispizza

Meals. Ingredients: VEHNÄjauho, vesi, kasvisseos (tomaatti, porkkana, sipuli, paprika, purjo, valkosipuli), tomaattimurska (tomaatti, tomaattitäysmehu, happamuudensäätöaine (sitruunahappo)), tomaattikastike (tomaattipyree ja - murska, vesi, sokeri, suola, etikka, rapsiöljy, mustapippuri, säilöntäineet (E202, E211), teksturoitu vehnä (vehnäjauho, väri E150c), rapsiöljy, vegaaninen raaste (vesi, kookosöljy, modifioitu perunatärkkelys, merisuola, modifioitu tapiokatärkkelys, vegaaninen mauste, oliivi - ja pihlaja-aromi, väri (betakaroteeni)), sokeri, suola, vehnäraski (kuivattu vehnähapantaikina), mausteseos (mm. paprika, kurkuma, oregano), tärkkelys (modifioitu perunatärkkelys(E1422), maltodextriini), säilöntäaine (E202). Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Lidl

Lasagne Carbonara

Meals. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreCMeals

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Similar options worth comparing

Лента

Ролл Цезарь

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Selver

Makaroni-singisalat

NOVA4Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

HoviRuoka

Vihispizza

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Lidl

Lasagne Carbonara

Meals. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreCMeals

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (49 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (2)

E160C E339

Product & Packaging

CategoryMeals

Label information quality72/100

Data confidence

Quantity160g

PackagingKomposiitti

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

72/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (49 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Rainbow Juustopasta-ateria

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Ролл Цезарь

Makaroni-singisalat

Vihispizza

Lasagne Carbonara

Rainbow Juustopasta-ateria

Similar options worth comparing

Ролл Цезарь

Makaroni-singisalat

Vihispizza

Lasagne Carbonara

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs