Search catalog

Hartwall Jaffa Lime-Verigreippi Sokeriton · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Low signal

Hartwall Jaffa Lime-Verigreippi Sokeriton

Name: Hartwall Jaffa Lime-Verigreippi Sokeriton
Brand: Hartwall
SKU: 6413600156871

The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreBNOVA4

Lisaained:12 tk

Andmete katvus:68%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Non-sugar sweeteners (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Formulation markers such as patentsinine (E131), aspartaam, atsesulfaam-K (E950) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (32 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Energy / 100g

2 kcal

Protein / 100g

0 g

Sugar / 100g

0.2 g

Nutrition score73/100 · Grade B

Ingredient-level explanation

Vesi, hedelmämehu tiivisteestä (appelsiini, limetti, sitruuna, greippi), hiilidioksidi, sitrushedelmäuute (appelsiini, sitruuna), happamuudensäätöaineet (E330, E331), luontainen aromi, makeutusaineet (aspartaami, E950), hapettumisenestoaine (E300), säilöntäaine (E202), stabilointiaineet (E414, E445, E410), värit (E160, E131).

Tuvastatud lisaained (12)

E131 E160 E202 E290 E300 E330 E331 E410 E414 E445 E950 E951

Product & Packaging

CategoryPlant-based

Label information quality64/100

Data confidence

Quantity1,5 l

PackagingMuovi,PET

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

73/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 73/100

Quite good

environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Environmental signal

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Strong

80/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

64/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Non-sugar sweeteners (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as patentsinine (E131), aspartaam, atsesulfaam-K (E950) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 78%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: fiber per 100g, allergens, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Elovena

Jugu sitruuna

Plant-based. Ingredients: Kaurapohja (vesi, gluteeniton kaura 8%), sokeri, sitruuna 4,2% (tiivisteestä), tärkkelys (peruna, maissi), rapsiöljy, sakeuttamisaineet (pektiini, gellaanikumi), sitruskuitu, perunaproteiini, kalsium, happamuudensäätöaine (natriumsitraatti), väri (beetakaroteeni, paprikaväri), suola, aromit, vitamiinit (B2, B12, D2), hapate. Gluteeniton, maidoton, vegaaninen.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

First Price

Pickled onions

Plant-based. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreCPlant-based

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Saarioinen

6412000016389

Plant-based. Ingredients: Sokeri, mansikka, vesi, sakeuttamisaine (E440), happa muudensäätöaine (E 330), säilöntäaine (E 202). 100 g tuotetta sisältää 35 g marjaa.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Salvest

Sauerkraut soup vegan

Plant-based. Ingredients: Hapukapsas (48%), kartul, porgand, odrakruup, sibul, rapsiöli, sool, suhkur, maitsetaimed, vürtsid.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA3Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product