Search catalog

Fazer Fazer crisp Oat · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Signal unavailable

Fazer Fazer crisp Oat

Name: Fazer Fazer crisp Oat
Brand: Fazer
SKU: 6410349747001

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

NOVA2

Lisaained:0 lisaainet

Andmete katvus:59%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

Uncertain or missing data

Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

A long ingredient list (131 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Uncertain or missing data

The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Wheat flour, high-fibre oat bran (17%), rye bran, sugar, rapeseed oil, yeast, iodized salt. May contain barley. Store in a dry place and protected from light. Producer: Fazer Confectionery, Finland. (RU) Сухарики овсяные. Масса нетто 180г. Состав: мука пшеничная хлебопекарная, отруби овсяные с высоким содержанием пищевых волокон (17%), отруби ржаные, сахар, масло рапсовое рафинированное, дрожжи хлебопекарные, соль йодированная. Продукт может содержать следы злаков, содержащие глютен. Хранить при температуре 18°C - 22°С и относительной влажности воздуха не более 60%. Изготовитель: Fazer Confectionery Ltd./Фацер Конфекшенари Лтд., PL 4, 00941 Helsinki, Финляндия. Адрес производства: Kasakkamäentie 3, 15800 Lahti, Финляндия. Импортер/Уполномоченное изготовителем лицо в России: 000 «Фацер», Россия, 196084, Санкт-Петербург, ул. Смоленская, д.18 А. (SV) Havreskorpa. Ingredienser: vetemjöl, fiberrikt havrekli (17%), rågkli, socker, rapsolja, jäst, joderat salt. Kan innehålla korn. Förvaras torrt och skyddat for ljus. Tillverkare: Fazer Konfektyr, Finland. (DE) Hafercrisp. Zutaten: Weizenmehl, Ballaststoffreiche Haferkleie (17%), Roggenkleie, Zucker, Rapsöl, Hefe, Jodsalz. Kann Gerste enthalten. Trocken und Licht geschützt lagern. Hersteller: Fazer Confectionery, Finnland. (ET) Kaeranäkileib. Koostisosad: nisujahu, kiudainerikas kaeraklii (17%), rukkikliid, suhkur, rapsiõli, pärm, jodeeritud sool. Võib sisaldada otra. Säilitada kuivas, otsese päikesevalguse eest kaitstuna. Tootja: Fazer Confectionery, Soome. (LV) Auzu sausmaizites. Sastävdalas: kviešu milti, auzu klijas (17%), rudzu klijas, cukurs, rapšu ella, raugs, jodetais säls. Var saturet miežu daļiņas. Uzglabāt sausā vietā, prom no tiešiem saules stariem. Ražotājs: "Fazer Confectionery", Somija. (LT) Avižiniai paplotėliai. Sudedamosios dalys: kvietiniai miltai, avižinės sėlenos su didesniu skaidulų kiekiu (17%), ruginės sėlenos, cukrus, rapsų aliejus, mielės, joduotoji druska. Gali būti miežių pėdsakų. Laikyti sausoje ir tamsioje vietoje. Gamintojas:„Fazer Confectionery", Suomija. (FR) Avoine croustillante. Ingrédients: farine de froment, son d'avoine riche en fibres (17%), son de seigle, sucre, huile de colza, levure, sel iodé. Peut contenir de l'orge.

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity180g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Environmental signal

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Moderately processed

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

A long ingredient list (131 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, category, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

Uncertain or missing data

Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

A long ingredient list (131 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Uncertain or missing data

The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity180g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Environmental signal

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Moderately processed

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

A long ingredient list (131 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Fazer Fazer crisp Oat

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Fazer Fazer crisp Oat

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid