Supporting factors
- Protein (8.6 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Energy / 100g
70 kcal
Protein / 100g
8.6 g
Sugar / 100g
7.7 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Leche desnatada pasterizado, agua, azúcar, zumo de limón a partir de pa de naranja (0,6%), almidón modificado, concert espesanic aromas, extr Consumir preferente ), corrector de acidez (citratos de sodio fermento láctico, enzima lactasa ntes del: Ver tapa. Manténgase refrigerado entre 0 °C y+3°C. Esto envase contiene 1 ración (175g eika LAST YER e175 g + Quab Finan
Tuvastatud lisaained (1)
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Nutrition profile
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
73/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
No reliable assessment
—
Environmental signal is unavailable because metadata are too sparse.
Label quality
Quite good
70/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Protein (8.6 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (17 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Environmental data coverage is too weak for a reliable indicator.
Impact: high
Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).