Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Ainekset: vesi, mansikka 10%, rypäletäysmehu - tiiviste, mansikkatäysmehu 1% (tiivisteestä), sakeuttamisaine (guarkumi), muunnettu tärkkelys, happamuudensäätöaine (sitruunahappo), vāri (punajuuriväri), makeutusaineet (aspartaami*, asesulfaami K).
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
73/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed · Limited estimate
Very highly processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
81/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Non-sugar sweeteners (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as aspartaam support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Mittesuhkrulised magusained võivad vähendada suhkrukoormust, kuid ei tähenda automaatselt tervislikku valikut.
Kohe
Mõnel kasutajal võib esineda magusaisu püsimist või kerget seedetrakti ebamugavust.
Pikemas vaates
Pikaajalised mõjud sõltuvad kasutusmustrist; seoseid käsitletakse pigem konteksti- kui absoluutse riskina.
Loogika: Koostises tuvastatakse magusained nagu aspartaam, sukraloos, atsesulfaam K, sahhariin või stevioolglükosiidid.
Signaalid: Leitud mittesuhkrulised magusained: aspartaam.
Kategooria on kontekstisignaal: tõlgendus sõltub toote üldisest koostisest ja kogu toitumismustrist.
Mittesuhkruliste magusainete märge tähendab, et toode vajab lapse puhul lisatõlgendust, mitte automaatset heakskiitu.
Miks oluline
Rakendus aitab vältida lihtsat järeldust, et "zero" = igapäevaselt parem valik. Otsus sõltub kogu toote koostisest ja tarbimismustrist.
Kohe
Mõju võib olla neutraalne, kuid magusa maitse harjumus võib püsida.
Pikemas vaates
Võib toetada harjumust eelistada püsivalt väga magusat maitseprofiili.
Põhineb WHO mittesuhkruliste magusainete juhisel: neid ei käsitleta esmase lahendusena kehakaalu või krooniliste riskide vähendamisel.
Signaalid: Leitud mittesuhkrulised magusained: aspartaam.