Search catalog

Urtekram Bouillon Umami · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:High signal

Urtekram Bouillon Umami

Name: Urtekram Bouillon Umami
Brand: Urtekram
SKU: 5701058012872

The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreE

Lisaained:0 lisaainet

Andmete katvus:48%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

High sodium content (18320 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
High saturated fat (11 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

Need attention

Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.

What would improve the assessment

Processing classification needs a fuller ingredient list and any declared NOVA information.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing an ingredient list.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Energy / 100g

310 kcal

Protein / 100g

2.3 g

Sugar / 100g

5.9 g

Nutrition score29/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality59/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Insufficient evidence

Environmental Impact

Environmental signal

Nutrition score

29/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 29/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

29/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

NOVA —

Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Mixed

59/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

High sodium content (18320 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
High saturated fat (11 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
Some nutrient values may need review (1 checks).
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: fiber per 100g, ingredients or ingredients, NOVA group, quantity, ingredients, allergens, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Maggi

Lihaliemi

Food. Ingredients: Jodioitu suola, maltodekstriini, perunatärkkelys, vehnäproteiinihydrolysaatti (vehnägluteeni, suola, palmuöljy, dekstroosi, sokeri), sokeri, värit (sokerikulööri, ammoniumsulfiittimenetelmän sokerikulööri), ekstraneitsytoliiviöljy (5%), naudanliha (2,2%), aromit, hiivauute, arominvahvenne (dinatrium-5'-ribonukleotidit). mustapippuri, hapettumisenestoaine (rosmariiniuute). Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA4Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Knorr

Köttbuljong

Food. Ingredients: Salt, vegetabiliskt fett (palm, shea, sal), stärkelse, arom, socker, jästextrakt, nötköttsfett 3 %, buljongpulver av oxben 2,1 %, karamelliserad sockersirap, lökpulver, maltodextrin, persilja, morot, kryddor (bl.a. sellerifrö), antioxidationsmedel (rosmarinextrakt).. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Natur compagnie

vištienos sultinys

Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

Food

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Maggi

Kostilija

Food. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreEFood

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

High sodium content (18320 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
High saturated fat (11 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

Need attention

Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.

What would improve the assessment

Processing classification needs a fuller ingredient list and any declared NOVA information.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing an ingredient list.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Energy / 100g

310 kcal

Protein / 100g

2.3 g

Sugar / 100g

5.9 g

Nutrition score29/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality59/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Insufficient evidence

Environmental Impact

Environmental signal

Nutrition score

29/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 29/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Nutrition profile

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

29/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

NOVA —

Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Mixed

59/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

High sodium content (18320 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
High saturated fat (11 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
Some nutrient values may need review (1 checks).
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high

Urtekram Bouillon Umami

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Processing level

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Environmental Impact

Nutrition score 29/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Lihaliemi

Köttbuljong

vištienos sultinys

Kostilija

Urtekram Bouillon Umami

Similar options worth comparing

Lihaliemi

Köttbuljong

vištienos sultinys

Kostilija

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Processing level

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Environmental Impact

Nutrition score 29/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Kõrge soolasisaldus

Kõrge küllastunud rasva sisaldus

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Kõrge soolasisaldus lapse menüüs

Kõrge küllastunud rasva taustsignaal