Search catalog

Isey Skyr Air Mango-orange · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Moderate signal

Isey Skyr Air Mango-orange

Name: Isey Skyr Air Mango-orange
Brand: Isey
SKU: 5690845002380

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4

Lisaained:3 tk

Andmete katvus:85%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Protein (8.4 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.

Need attention

Added sugars are unavailable, so sugar handling relies conservatively on total sugars.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (50 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (100%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Energy / 100g

95 kcal

Protein / 100g

8.4 g

Sugar / 100g

9.7 g

Nutrition score67/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Pastöroitu rasvaton maito (DK), vesi, sokeri, pastöroitu kerma (4%), mango (4%), omena (4%), appelsiini (2%), gelatini, muunnettu maissitärkkelys, emulgointiaine (rasvahappojen mono ja diglyseridien maitohappoesterit), sakeuttamisaine (pektiini), aromi, laktaasientsyymi, skyrhapatteet. Vatkattu typen avulla. Skyr Air Mango-apelsin. Med socker. Ingredienser: Pastoriserad fettfri mjölk (DK), vatten, socker, pastöriserad grädde (4%), mango (4%), äpple (4%), apelsin (2%), gelatin, modifierad majsstärkelse, emulgeringsmedel mjölksyraestrar av mono - och diglycerider av fettsyror), förtjockningsmedel (pektin), arom, laktasenzym, skyrsyrakulturer. Vispad med kväve.

Tuvastatud lisaained (3)

E428 E440 E472B

Product & Packaging

CategoryDairies

Label information quality95/100

Data confidence

Quantity125 g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

67/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 67/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

67/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

54/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

95/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (100%).
Impact: medium
Protein (8.4 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (50 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 78%.
Impact: medium
Added sugars are unavailable, so sugar handling relies conservatively on total sugars.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: fiber per 100g. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

TCE

Sana

Dairies. Ingredients: Lapte de vacă normalizat şi pasteurizat, culturi lactice selecţionate. Conţine lactoză.. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreBNOVA1Lower processing burden

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

TCE

Chefir

Dairies. Ingredients: Ingrediente: lapte de vacă normalizat şi pasteurizat culturi lactice selecţionate. Conţine lactoză.. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreBNOVA1Lower processing burden

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Valio

Profeel Mango

Dairies. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreABalanced nutrition

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts

4770265218873

Dairies. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreCDairies

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Protein (8.4 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.

Need attention

Added sugars are unavailable, so sugar handling relies conservatively on total sugars.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (50 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (100%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Energy / 100g

95 kcal

Protein / 100g

8.4 g

Sugar / 100g

9.7 g

Nutrition score67/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (3)

E428 E440 E472B

Product & Packaging

CategoryDairies

Label information quality95/100

Data confidence

Quantity125 g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

67/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 67/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

67/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

54/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

95/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (100%).
Impact: medium
Protein (8.4 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (50 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 78%.
Impact: medium
Added sugars are unavailable, so sugar handling relies conservatively on total sugars.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: fiber per 100g. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Isey Skyr Air Mango-orange

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Need attention

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 67/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Sana

Chefir

Profeel Mango

4770265218873

Isey Skyr Air Mango-orange

Similar options worth comparing

Sana

Chefir

Profeel Mango

4770265218873

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Need attention

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 67/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs