Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.
Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
100%-matched dashi bonito and kombu dashi stock name: rice miso (with dashi), salt, kombud dashi, bonito extract, bonito powder, umbleojimishi powder/soy sauce, seasoning (aminoic acid, etc.), stek flavor ingredients name: soybean genetically modified), mother's soup stock and rice with raw material board, soup stock. contents: listed under 800 expiration date: frame sunlight avoid high temperatures and store at room temperature storage method: maruki co., ltd. manufacturer okojiru shuno. the sun, please like it. cabbage sora, takeko 399-4501 the 2701 nishi-seiwaron, ina city, sano prefecture symbol is listed at the bottom of the expiration date display. cha, thys, onions, each other, high degree of manufacturing it does not question the quality even if it changes, but it can be suppressed by storing a refrigerator car. - it is a part of the ingredients of soybean skin rice, dashi, alcause the extremely small of the study color may be seen in the ming. if you warm the miso, stir it and heat it. it cannot be used for this microwave oven. also. don't pour boiling water into the bag. becomes darker. difference, sweet potato, burdock, mushroom radish, erysa, leek, komatsuna, shidami delicious miso soup. 1 tablespoon (about 80 c) of miso (18 g to 20 g) is 1 tablespoon in a bowl, and then seasoned to create more flavor. plastic nutritional information (per 100g miso) energy protein fat carbohydrate salt equivalent 4902401 507279 customer service room 0120-870780 except holidays 9:00-17:30) hanamaruki homepage attp://www,hanamaruki,co,jp
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
processing is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Processing
Weakest area
Label quality
Data confidence
low
Data confidence
Low reliability
Data coverage is limited and the result should be interpreted with caution.
Category breakdown
The data does not support a reliable overall result.
Nutrition profile
No reliable assessment
—
Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
Moderately processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Mixed
52/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
Data is limited. The result should be treated as an initial indication rather than a final assessment.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (38%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (65 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.