Search catalog

Mamuko Mamuko · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Signal unavailable

Mamuko Mamuko

Name: Mamuko Mamuko
Brand: Mamuko
SKU: 4779032700191

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Lisaained:0 lisaainet

Andmete katvus:54%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.

What would improve the assessment

Processing classification needs a fuller ingredient list and any declared NOVA information.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing an ingredient list.
The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality67/100

Data confidence

Quantity240g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Insufficient evidence

Environmental Impact

Environmental signal

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Environmental signal

Weakest area

Label quality

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

NOVA —

Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, ingredients or ingredients, NOVA group, ingredients, nutrition panel, allergens, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Nestlé

NAN PRO 2

Food. Ingredients: Vatten, skum - mjölk, laktos (mjölk), vegetabi - liska oljor (sotros, raps), avsaltat vasslepulver (mjölk), vassleper - meat (mjölk), 2-fukosyllaktos/ difukosyllaktosblandning, lakto-N - tetraos (med laktos), 3'-sialyl - laktosnatriumsalt, 6-sialyllaktos - natriumsalt, olja från mikroalgen Schizochytrium sp., emulgerings - medel (sojalecitin). L-fenylalanin. L-isoleucin, L-leucin, L-tryptofan, L-histidin, L-threonin, L-valin, mineralämnen (natrium, kalium, kalcium, järn, magnesium, zink, jod koppar, mangan, selen), vitaminer (A DEK.C, tiamin, niacin, B folsyra, Biz biotin, pantotensyral.. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Muru baby

6430067350789

Food. Ingredients: Maissijauho (82 %), auringonkukkaöljy, tomaattijauhe (8%), oregano, hapettumisenestoaine (tokoferoliuute), tiamiini.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA3Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts

Milupa

Food. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreCWell-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts

8445290832900

Food. Ingredients: Tomaattisose* 29%, vesi, porkkana* 15%, kesäkurpitsa* 12%, peruna* 12%, kikherne* 7,7%, kaurahiutale* 3,9%, rypsiöljy*, oregano*. *Luomuraaka-aine. Sisältää 56% kasviksia.. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA1Lower processing burden

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.

What would improve the assessment

Processing classification needs a fuller ingredient list and any declared NOVA information.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing an ingredient list.
The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality67/100

Data confidence

Quantity240g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Insufficient evidence

Environmental Impact

Environmental signal

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Environmental signal

Weakest area

Label quality

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

NOVA —

Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high

Mamuko Mamuko

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Environmental Impact

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

NAN PRO 2

6430067350789

Milupa

8445290832900

Mamuko Mamuko

Similar options worth comparing

NAN PRO 2

6430067350789

Milupa

8445290832900

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Environmental Impact

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid