Pronat
Garam Masala condment Eco
Condiments. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
Condiments
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Pronat
Condiments. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Open Food Facts
Condiments. Ingredients: Punainen chili (30 %), sitruunaruoho, valkosipuli, salottisipuli, suola, kaffirlimetinlehti, mausteet (korianteri, juustokumina), galangajuuri, happamuudensäätöaine (sitruunahappo). Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
K-Classic
Condiments. Ingredients: Pjaustyti pomidorai 52,3%, pomidorų sultys 17,4%, mascarpone sūris 14% (pienas, grietinėlė, rūgštingumą reguliuojanti medžiaga E330), pomidorų pasta 11%, gražgarstės 1,5%, cukrus, raudonieji svogūnai, druska, ypač tyras alyvuogių aliejus, rūgštingumą reguliuojanti medžiaga E330, baltieji pipirai. 100 g produkto maistingumas: energinė verte 309 kJ/ 74 kcal, riebalai 4,2 g, iš kurių sočiųjų riebalų rūgščių 2,7 g, angliavandeniai 6,2 g, iš kurių cukrų 5,5 g, skaidulinės medžiagos 1,5 g, baltymai 2,1 g, druska 1,2 g.. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Open Food Facts
Condiments. Ingredients: Garstyčios. Sudedamosios dalys: geriamasis vanduo, baltųjų garstyčiu solos, spirito actas, cukrus, rudųjų garstyčių sėklos, valgomoji druska, prieskoniai, karamelizuoto cukraus sirupas.. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
55 kcal
Protein / 100g
1.4 g
Sugar / 100g
5.8 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Environmental signal
Weakest area
Label quality
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
67/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Processing unknown
Insufficient evidence
Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.
Environmental signal
Strong
95/100
Product-specific environmental signal.
Label quality
Mixed
59/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared Eco-Score A supports the environmental indicator.
Impact: high
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing ingredient evidence.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.