Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.
Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
(ondelez, international flame-containing product) dessert with cocoa "dus - glazed, fatty, frozen product, edients: quark mass 83% (low-fat quark 57%, palm oil, sugar, sawdust starch, xanthan gumfish, sodium alginate), cocoa powder 9 2%, preservative potassium sorbate), cocoa glaze 17% (palm oil then daisa — gator rapeseed lecithin, flavorings) contains sugar, traces of possible alice peanuts and other nuts, contains sugar, producers' m contains sugar, the shelf date indicated on the packaging is not allowed, no re-freezing, quark origin - lithuania, store frozen (sc and thawed product store (0) 6) at a temperature of c, for 20 days, no
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The data does not support a reliable overall result.
Nutrition profile
No reliable assessment
—
Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed · Limited estimate
Very highly processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
60/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (38%).
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as letsitiin, ksantaankummi support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.