What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Energy / 100g
144 kcal
Protein / 100g
6.7 g
Sugar / 100g
3 g
Ingredient-level explanation
croissants from crab sticks, chilled foods: water, crab sticks-28% (fish meat, stabilizers: sorbitol, diphosphate: e450, triphosphate: е451, polyphosphate: e452,sugar), wheat starch ( contains wheat), egg whites, canola oil, rapeseed oil, soy protein, sugar, salt, crab flavour (contains crustaceans and flavor enhancer е635), flavours, egg yolk, coloring: e171, e120, e160с, stabilizer: carrageenan, can contain molluscs, milk, lactose, celery and mustard
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Nutrition profile
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
71/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Mixed
57/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 44%.
Impact: medium
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).