Supporting factors
- Fiber (3.5 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Energy / 100g
200 kcal
Protein / 100g
7 g
Sugar / 100g
5 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Salt, swad red, , paprika, garlic, sugar, gingar, starch, black pepper
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Nutrition profile
Weakest area
Label quality
Data confidence
low
Data confidence
Low reliability
Data coverage is limited and the result should be interpreted with caution.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
73/100
Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
Moderately processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Mixed
56/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
Data is limited. The result should be treated as an initial indication rather than a final assessment.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Fiber (3.5 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (17 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 22%.
Impact: medium
The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.
Impact: low
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.