Supporting factors
- Fiber (9.5 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Energy / 100g
220 kcal
Protein / 100g
6.099999904632568 g
Sugar / 100g
4.400000095367432 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Nutrition profile
Weakest area
Label quality
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.
Nutrition profile
Strong
78/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Processing unknown
Insufficient evidence
Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.
Environmental signal
No reliable assessment
—
Environmental signal is unavailable because metadata are too sparse.
Label quality
Mixed
59/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Fiber (9.5 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
Environmental data coverage is too weak for a reliable indicator.
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.