The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Brutaria traditionala
Snacks. Ingredients: Fäinä superioară rau, sare. zahar, drojdie, grasimi vegetale nehidrogenate. aud, lapin, statale, brbuzh vel 40%, aroma. Centine: gluten, cul, lapta.. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Nordthy
Snacks. Ingredients: Süßungsmitteln (E965, E960a), 2,2% Ammoniumchlorid, Süßholzpulver, Säureregulator (E296) Salz, Farbstoffe (E120, E131, E153, E160a), Aromen, Paprika. Kann Spuren von Soja und Milch enthalten. Mit Süßungs - mitteln, kann bei übermäßigem Verzehr abführend wirken. Wir empfehlen nicht mehr als 20g pro Tag. Erwachsenenlakritz. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Cloetta
Snacks. Ingredients: Sweeteners (xylitol 35%, sorbitol, mannitol, acesulfame K, sucralose), chewing gum base mass, flavourings, acidity regulators (citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid), humectant (glycerol), emulsifier (lecithins), antioxidant (BHT).. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Taffel
Snacks. Ingredients: Corn flour, vegetable oils (sunflower, rapeseed), spice mix (maltodextrin (from maize or potato), CHEESE POWDER (EU), CREAM POWDER, flavour enhancer (E621, E635), salt, dextrose, flavouring, tomato, glucose syrup, sugar, aroma, potassium chloride, spice extract (paprika, cayenne pepper), onion, acidity regulator (citric acid WHEY POWDER (from MILK)). May contain traces of WHEAT. Gluten free. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Sudedamosios dalys: sėklų duona (66 proc.) (natūralus ruginis raugas, vanduo, aukščiausios rūšies kvietiniai miltai, viso grūdo ruginiai miltai, sezamo sėklos, linų sėmenys, saulėgrąžų sėklos (iš viso sėklų 30 proc.)), saulėgrąžų aliejus, česnakas, jūros druska.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
35/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
Moderately processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
81/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
A long ingredient list (14 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
