no brand
Krevety celé varené 60/80
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
Food
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
_garneles_ Penaeus vannamei 80%, ūdens, sāls, skābuma regulētājs E330
Tuvastatud lisaained (1)
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
71/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
Highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Weak
41/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
93/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.