The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Veganic
Meat Alternatives. Ingredients: Water, wheat flour, rapeseed oil, lentil flour, baked eggplant, durum wheat flour, sunflower seed, vinegar, textured pea, beetroot powder, spices and flavorings, salt, sugar. May contain traces of soy, celery, sesame, mustard.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Valio
Meat Alternatives. Ingredients: Vesi, gluteeniton kauralese 15 %, herneproteiini, härkäpapuproteiini, mausteet (sipuli, paprika, valkosipuli, tomaattijauhe, basilika, mustapippuri, maustepippuri, oregano, cayennepippuri), aromit, fariinisokeri, melassi, jodioitu suola, suola.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Härkis
Meat Alternatives. Ingredients: Vesi, gluteeniton kauralese 15 %, herneproteiini, härkäpapuproteiini, mausteet (paprika, sipuli, tomaattijauhe, valkosipuli, juustokumina, chili, korianteri, oregano), aromit, sokeri, melassi, jodioitu suola.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Sofine Food
Meat Alternatives. Ingredients: soy protein. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
157 kcal
Protein / 100g
12 g
Sugar / 100g
0.7 g
Ingredient-level explanation
Yellow pea protein 76%, drinking water, rapeseed oil, nori algae 1%, seasoning preparation 0.6% dried garlic, onion, white pepper), salt, lemon oil 0.6%.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
67/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
Moderately processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
50/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
68/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Protein (12 g/100 g) provides limited support to the nutrition score.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
No significant negative factors emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 67%.
Impact: medium
The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.
Impact: low
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
