no brand
Krevety celé varené 60/80
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
Food
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Energy / 100g
252 kcal
Protein / 100g
18 g
Sugar / 100g
0 g
Ingredient-level explanation
kūpinātas reņģes Clupea harengus membras 70%, rapšu eļļa 28%, pārtikas sāls
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
low
Data confidence
Low reliability
Data coverage is limited and the result should be interpreted with caution.
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
45/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
Moderately processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
47/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
70/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
Data is limited. The result should be treated as an initial indication rather than a final assessment.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
High sodium content (800 mg/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Record completeness is 56%.
Impact: medium
The processing indicator is inferred rather than declared directly.
Impact: low
Image evidence covers about 0% of the key fields.
Impact: low
Kõrge soolasisaldus viitab suuremale naatriumikoormusele, mida tasub igapäevases tarbimises piirata.
Kohe
Võib suurendada janu ja mõnel inimesel soodustada vedelikupeetust.
Pikemas vaates
Sage liigne soolatarbimine seostub kõrgema vererõhu riskiga.
Loogika: salt100g > 1.2 g/100 g.
Signaalid: Sool 2 g/100 g ületab lävendi 1.2 g/100 g.
Tegu on riskisignaaliga, mitte meditsiinilise hinnanguga. Oluline on kogu päeva soolakoormus.
Kui soola on palju, suunab rakendus vanema tähelepanu lapse päevase soolakoormuse ja maitseharjumuste kujunemisele.
Miks oluline
Lapse toitumises tasub väga soolaseid valikuid piirata, sest harjumused kujunevad varakult ja mõjutavad ka hilisemat eelistust.
Kohe
Võib tekkida tugevam janu ja soov juua rohkem.
Pikemas vaates
Võib toetada soolasema maitse eelistust ja ebasoodsat vererõhu riskisuunda.
Põhineb tugeval rahvusvahelisel juhisel: WHO naatriumisoovitused (lastel kohandatakse vajadus allapoole).
Signaalid: Sool 2 g/100 g ületab lävendi 1.2 g/100 g.