Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
wheat mitti, water, sugar, yeast, iodized salt, rapeseed oil, the product may contain sesame seeds and milk products dali ii, состав пшеничная мука, вода, сахар, дрожжи, йодированная соль, рапсовое масло, продукт может содержать се ужута и молочные продукты, oghidrat/yrnesogl lestarpokuni/ в том числе сахар svedivelas/sule borohkg olcatummies/genw since 1946 net mass 2,0g lusarppestinatas taksi@bes/в том числе насыщенные жирные кислоты 0,39 100 g contains / 100 г содержит 1145 kj/270 kcal 55.0g 3, 1g 3.6g 8.0g 10g one skkeel (21 g) contains 240 kj/57 kcal pp egan manufacturer: fazer latvija sia, druvas iela 2, ogre, lv-5001 talrunis 65071050 free phone for reviews 80007017 www,fazer,lv@fazerlatvija fazer latvia 0.49 0.1g 11.5g 0.79 0.2g sas/comb *% of the recommended dose for an adult, recommended dose for the average adult (8400 kj or 2000 kcal), to date, indicated on the clasp, 500 g 0.8g 179 2.8%* 0.696 0.39* 55 neur food 3.5%
Tuvastatud lisaained (1)
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
processing is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Processing
Weakest area
Label quality
Data confidence
low
Data confidence
Low reliability
Data coverage is limited and the result should be interpreted with caution.
Category breakdown
The data does not support a reliable overall result.
Nutrition profile
No reliable assessment
—
Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
Moderately processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Mixed
52/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
Data is limited. The result should be treated as an initial indication rather than a final assessment.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (38%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (40 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
