Search catalog

Taffel Chips · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:High signal

Taffel Chips

Name: Taffel Chips
Brand: Taffel
SKU: 4750024002134

The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreENOVA4

Lisaained:2 tk

Andmete katvus:78%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

Uncertain or missing data

Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (117 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score35/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Potatoes (61%), vegetable oil (sunflower oil (S)* or palrr oil (P)*, or rapeseed oil mix (7%) (sugar, salt, onion powder, flavourings, garlic powder, maltodextrin (maize), acid (otrcantl tomato powder (4%), yeast extract, partially hidrogenated rapeseed oil, colour (paprika extrad antioxidant (extracts of rosemary)). "Information regarding used oil see next to the expiration date Op of potatoes: EU. Made in Latvia. RU Картофельные чипсы <<Сан Диего с пряным томатным вкуси Состав: картофель (61%), растительное масло (подсолнечное (S)" или пальмовое масло), приправа (7%) (сахар, соль, луковый по кошок, ароматизаторы, чесночны мальтодекстрин (кукуруза), регулятор кислотности (лимонная кислота), томатный дрожжевой экстракт, частично гидрогенизированное рапсовое масло, краситель б антиокислитель (экстракты розмарина) Обоне использованного наси информации о сроке годности. Местонско картофеля: ЕС. Изготовани MN Халуун ногоотой ули амтай San Diego рапсын тос (R)), хали ногооны холимог (7%) (элсэн чихэр, давс, соНГИНЫ Ори йрлага: төмс (61%) амлын тос (наранцэцэгийн тос (S)*, эсвэл дар саримсны нунт, мальтодекстрин (эрдэнэшиш), хүчиллэг зохицуулагч лоолийн (4%), исгэгчний ханд, хэсэгчлэн устөрөгчжүүлсэн рапсины Чиликүүний ханд), антиоксидант (розмарины ханд). • Ашигласан тосны МЭДЭЭЛЛИЙ хажуунаас харна уу. Латви улсад үйлдвэрлэв. Төмсний гарал үүсэл, жороо, 19-р хороолол, Хан-Уул дүүрэг, Улаанбаатар хот, Монгол улс. албан ёсны дистрибьютор: "Зебра Интернэшнл Дистрибьюшн" ХХК: №19 Шаравын пик GA Утас Европын 7711-2727 Чипси картопляні С Детя Склад картопля (82%), олія рослинна соняшникова (S)* чи пальмова (Р)", чи ріпакова ( спецій (7%) (укор, Оль, порошки, цибулі, ароматизатори, порошок часнику мальция кукурудзи, регулятор кислотності (кисель лимонна), порошок томату (4%) екстракт држ смаком томатів TM Taffel (Ta Опакова частково гідрогенізована, барани Текстракт Позначення використаної олії вказано білястракт паприки), антиоксидант картоплі країни ЄС. Продукт готовий до споживя. Кінцева дата споживание «вмити зазначені на упаковці. Строк придатності до la 22. Riga, V-1001, Латвія, тел. +371620ання: 6 місяців. Ви Импортер дистриб'ютор в Україні: ТОВ "Стор Фуд. Дистрибюши", Претензії в Ставищенский р-н, Київська обл., 08400, Україна, тел: «ДАЛЕКО www.storefbod викомації про кінцеву дату спожщания Мсцев

Tuvastatud lisaained (2)

E1001 E392

Product & Packaging

CategoryPlant-based

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity130gr

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

35/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 35/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

35/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (117 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Elovena

Jugu sitruuna

Plant-based. Ingredients: Kaurapohja (vesi, gluteeniton kaura 8%), sokeri, sitruuna 4,2% (tiivisteestä), tärkkelys (peruna, maissi), rapsiöljy, sakeuttamisaineet (pektiini, gellaanikumi), sitruskuitu, perunaproteiini, kalsium, happamuudensäätöaine (natriumsitraatti), väri (beetakaroteeni, paprikaväri), suola, aromit, vitamiinit (B2, B12, D2), hapate. Gluteeniton, maidoton, vegaaninen.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

First Price

Pickled onions

Plant-based. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreCPlant-based

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Saarioinen

6412000016389

Plant-based. Ingredients: Sokeri, mansikka, vesi, sakeuttamisaine (E440), happa muudensäätöaine (E 330), säilöntäaine (E 202). 100 g tuotetta sisältää 35 g marjaa.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Salvest

Sauerkraut soup vegan

Plant-based. Ingredients: Hapukapsas (48%), kartul, porgand, odrakruup, sibul, rapsiöli, sool, suhkur, maitsetaimed, vürtsid.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA3Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

Uncertain or missing data

Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (117 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score35/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (2)

E1001 E392

Product & Packaging

CategoryPlant-based

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity130gr

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

35/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 35/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

35/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (117 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Taffel Chips

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 35/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Jugu sitruuna

Pickled onions

6412000016389

Sauerkraut soup vegan

Taffel Chips

Similar options worth comparing

Jugu sitruuna

Pickled onions

6412000016389

Sauerkraut soup vegan

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 35/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs