Search catalog

Aquanine Natural Citrus · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Signal unavailable

Aquanine Natural Citrus

Name: Aquanine Natural Citrus
Brand: Aquanine
SKU: 4745010379031

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

NOVA4

Lisaained:5 tk

Andmete katvus:75%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as karamellvärv (E150) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (22 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

ŪDENS, CUKURS, SKĀBUMA REGULĒTĀJS CITRONSKĀBE, DABĪGS AROMATIZĒTĀJS "GREIPFRŪTS UN LAIMS", DABĪGS PĀRTIKAS AROMATIZĒTĀJS "INGVERA" EKSTRAKTS, PĀRTIKAS KRĀSVIELA KARAMELE (E150D), PĀRTIKAS KRĀSVIELA BETA-KARO - TINS E160A, KONSERVANTI - NĀTRIJA BENZOĀTS, KĀLIJA SORBĀTS, STABILIZATORI: GUMA RABIKA (E414), KOKA KOLOFONIJA GLICERĪNA ESTERI E445.

Tuvastatud lisaained (5)

E150D E202 E211 E330 E414

Product & Packaging

CategoryBeverages

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity500 ml

OriginsPolija

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as karamellvärv (E150) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (22 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Promess

Braškių skonio pienas

Beverages. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreEBeverages

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts

4304493271265

Beverages. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreBBeverages

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Seth & Riley's

Seth & Riley's Garage Hard Lemon Zero Alcohol

Beverages. Ingredients: Vesi, suhkur, odralinnased, süsihappegaas, hape - E330, sidrunimahla kontsentraat, stabilisaatorid - E414, E445, E444, E412, looduslik tsitruse lõhna - ja maitseaine koos teiste looduslike lõhna - ja maitseainetega, humalad, antioksüdant - E300, säilitusaine - E202. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA4Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts

4749492000018

Beverages. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

Beverages

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as karamellvärv (E150) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (22 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (5)

E150D E202 E211 E330 E414

Product & Packaging

CategoryBeverages

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity500 ml

OriginsPolija

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as karamellvärv (E150) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (22 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Aquanine Natural Citrus

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Braškių skonio pienas

4304493271265

Seth & Riley's Garage Hard Lemon Zero Alcohol

4749492000018

Aquanine Natural Citrus

Similar options worth comparing

Braškių skonio pienas

4304493271265

Seth & Riley's Garage Hard Lemon Zero Alcohol

4749492000018

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs