Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Rukkijahu, päevalilleseemned (28%), odralinnaseekstrakt, rukkijuure nisujahu, suhkur, kääritatud ruklinnased, vesi, starter, happesuse regulaatorid - äädikhape), pärm, jodeeritud sool, jahuparandaja (nisujahu, nisulinnasejahu, nisugi teen, piimhape, orgaaniline acerola pulber, ensüümid). Toode võib sisaldada kaera-, piima-, muna, maapähkli-, seesamiseemnete osakesi. Toiteväärtus Energia.......... Rasvad...... millest küllastunud....... rasvhappeid Süsivesikud......... millest suhkruid. Kiudained.............. Valgud........... Sool.......... 100g RI,% 1931 kJ/460 kcal.......9 15,8 g 0,9 1,3 g ......0,3 60,9 g ......0,9 12,7g......0,6 10,3 g .13,5g........ 1,58 g......... **RI-keskmise täiskasvanu võrdluskogus (8400 kJ/2000 kcal) *% võrdluskogusest
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
53/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed · Limited estimate
Highly processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
81/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (54 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.