Search catalog

Deary Oat Cream · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Signal unavailable

Deary Oat Cream

Name: Deary Oat Cream
Brand: Deary
SKU: 4740036014676

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

NOVA4

Lisaained:3 tk

Andmete katvus:61%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

Uncertain or missing data

Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as guarkummi, guarkummi (E412) support a more processed classification.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

Need attention

Environmental data coverage is too weak for a reliable indicator.

What would improve the assessment

Environmental indication needs more packaging, origin, or declared environmental metadata.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Water boiled, Oats rolled oat flakes, Rapeseed oil, Starch potato, Salt, Guar gum E412, Mono and diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono - and diglycerides of fatty acids E472e, Sodium citrates E331

Tuvastatud lisaained (3)

E331 E412 E472E

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality58/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

No reliable assessment

—

Environmental signal is unavailable because metadata are too sparse.

Label quality

Mixed

58/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as guarkummi, guarkummi (E412) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Environmental data coverage is too weak for a reliable indicator.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, category, packaging, origin, or ingredients, quantity, category, nutrition panel, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

Uncertain or missing data

Fruit, vegetable, legume, and nut share was inferred heuristically.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as guarkummi, guarkummi (E412) support a more processed classification.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

Need attention

Environmental data coverage is too weak for a reliable indicator.

What would improve the assessment

Environmental indication needs more packaging, origin, or declared environmental metadata.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Water boiled, Oats rolled oat flakes, Rapeseed oil, Starch potato, Salt, Guar gum E412, Mono and diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono - and diglycerides of fatty acids E472e, Sodium citrates E331

Tuvastatud lisaained (3)

E331 E412 E472E

Product & Packaging

CategoryFood

Label information quality58/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

No reliable assessment

—

Environmental signal is unavailable because metadata are too sparse.

Label quality

Mixed

58/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as guarkummi, guarkummi (E412) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Environmental data coverage is too weak for a reliable indicator.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high

Deary Oat Cream

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Deary Oat Cream

Nutrient profile

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs